User talk:Danielle Peers

Welcome!

Hello, Danielle Peers, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
I noticed you've made one or more edits to women's biographies. Should you be interested in helping to redress the balance of articles about women, you might wish to consider joining our Women in Red project. Less than 18% of biographies here are about women - and you could help us increase this!
Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Useful Wikipedia links:

Links for Women in Red project:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) This automatically inserts your name and the date. If you get stuck, please see our help pages. If you can't find what you are looking for there, feel free to ask at the Teahouse or at the Women in Red project's Talk Page. Alternatively, contact me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help you. Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 08:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Angela McRobbie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Angela McRobbie was changed by Danielle Peers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854121 on 2018-10-12T07:48:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:48, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted content

Hi, you might have noticed your edits to Angela McRobbie were undone. (click here to see what was reverted).

The above message was written by a computer program and is not correct and please ignore it - you did not vandalise Wikipedia.

However, your edit appears to be original research, essentially a book review. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and foundation to this goal is maintaining a neutral point of view founded on reliable sources. Critical book reviews are therefore out of scope.

Feel free to check out the teahouse if you need more help.

130.95.175.240 (talk) 07:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]