User talk:DanielleForrester1991

Hello, DanielleForrester1991. You have new messages at Illuminatusds's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, DanielleForrester1991. You have new messages at TomFirth19's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lab session today at 9:15 Aliciaag93 (talk) 09:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Danielle, Who are you working with? I am working with Alicia and Irina, we can see how many people we are allowed in a group :D Natalie Brocklesby (talk) 7th March 2014 (UTC)

Sure! I'm definitely working with Tom Firth, hopefully Darren will be okay with 5 in a group DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 14:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good hopefully he will allow 5, which theory are you thinking of doing, i thought of doing Expectancy violations theory because its on the exam Natalie Brocklesby (talk) 7th March 2014 (UTC)

If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page.

So we are working together on this, see my talk page for details.

--TomFirth19 (talk) 11:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, DanielleForrester1991 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.

Go through our online training for students.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!

 ToniSant (talk) 11:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, DanielleForrester1991, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. --Geniac (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, DanielleForrester1991. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲‍水 13:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, DanielleForrester1991. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 13:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! --Geniac (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats... You asked an awesome question in the Teahouse!

hi! Thanks for your great question about using Talkback notices. Keeping track of discussion can be challenging, but with Talkbacks and using your WP:WATCHLIST it gets a lot easier. Come back to the Teahouse any time with more great questions!

	Great Question Badge
	Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum. There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi^{t | c} 21:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This is mainly in recognition of the "Great Question Badge" you received from the Teahouse. Keep it up! ToniSant (talk) 10:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, that's very generous of you! :)

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve the Wikipedia Education Program

Hi DanielleForrester1991! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 16:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Psychology of Internet Behaviour

Hi Tom Firth, would you like to work together for the group presentation? DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 13:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

awesome :) I'm free tomorrow afternoon if you want to meet and make a start on research? 2pm in the library okay for you? Let me know DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 14:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, ok can do that TomFirth19 (talk) 14:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. Have you looked over the choice of topics? I'm not particularly fussed about improving the 'People' pages, I'd prefer to look at one of the theories in a bit more depth. I've had a read through the Elaboration likelihood model and Uncertainty reduction theory pages, and both are in need of improvements. The first contains a lot of information but the majority (if not all) lacks citation. The latter, whilst informative and well-cited, needs reorganising to ensure it is clear and concise. Do you have a preference on which we work on? I don't mind either :) DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Social Penetration Theory

Yes, that's what i'm thinking to do. Rosiesievers20 (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who else is working with you in your group? --Rosiesievers20 (talk) 11:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosie,

Sorry I'm only just getting back to you, I didn't see your message the last time I logged in :( I'm working with Nat, Tom, Irina and Alicia on the Expectancy Violations theory. How are you getting on with your work? DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still trying to get in a group, which is a bit annoying. I tried to ask nick and eugene but i hadn't had any replies yet. --Rosiesievers20 (talk) 21:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you're better off asking in person - I suspect not everyone will be checking on here as often as they probably should. The other thing is groups have to be 5 max. from what I gather. Your best bet is to check the Course page and see which subject areas need more people? DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 09:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, I'd be happy to join a group with you, Rosie. (I'm Sam, the guy who sat a couple seats over from you in the first lecture, you introduced yourself then). I've decided to do Social Penetration theory too, and having looked at the other people doing this and trying to figure out who's in a group or not, it seems like it'd be a good idea to team up with you! Kaolincash (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome from the first meeting

Hi guys, here's a breakdown of the expectancy violations theory sections and the person responsible for each bit:

Tom: History, Core Concepts of expectancy violations theory

Danielle: Theoretical viewpoints and assumptions, Metatheoretical assumptions

Irina: Common expectancy violations in nonverbal communications, Proxemics and kinesics of expectancy violations theory

Alicia: Common expectancy violations in close relationships, The theory in new media age

Nat: Related theories, Criticism of the theory, Further use and development of the theory

I hope you don't mind me giving you an extra one Nat, the other guys have got a bit more content in their sections that's all. Please don't hate me 0:)

This sounds good to me, we can meet up next week to do the work, plus I will do a Diagram for Proxemics Natbrock (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! I heard Rob from another group has also decided to do your section of Expectancy Violations theory...? We should definitely speak to Darren about it because it could create conflict on the article page DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll help nat with the diagram and we will have it ready for the next meeting we will have, nat reading through how to put images onto the wiki page. -- Aliciaag93 (talk) 09:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nat you said you want to work on the diagram, which is a section which has been assigned to me. Which sections are we swapping? Irina Predescu (talk) 09:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heya Irina can I do Proxemics and kinesics of expectancy violations theory? Either Criticism of the theory, Further use and development of the theory? its up to you?Natbrock (talk) 09:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Nat, you will do Proxemics and kinesics of expectancy violations theory and I will do Criticism of the theory Irina Predescu (talk) 09:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good to me thankyou :D Natbrock (talk) 09:48, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :D Irina Predescu (talk) 09:51, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hey guys, just to let you all know I did some editing on one of my sections on the live wiki page to see what would happen. Nat and I have also started with the information about proxemics and what type of diagram we are going to do. :D :D :D -- Aliciaag93 (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, DanielleForrester1991. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Group Presentations

I've just been informed that the presentations have to be individual, is this correct Toni/ Darren? The handbook says that a group presentation makes up 50% of the module mark, working in groups of 4-5. Can someone clarify which information is accurate as our group has already made a presentation (as is probably the case with the other groups). Thanks, DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danielle - firstly, it's not a good idea to start this conversation on your own talk page if it's a question for me and/or Darren (@Illuminatusds:). My talk page or his is a better place for this conversation. I saw you used the talk back function, which is good, but the banner for that needs to be placed at the bottom of the user's talk page not at the top; I missed it when I first went looking for it as this is not the conventional place to put it. No harm done, it's just that these are basic conventions with Wikipedia and it's good that you get a good understanding of such things to ensure that you're able to get the help that you need, when you need it, without any unnecessary delay.

Now, on to your question: as per the course page - "Each student will present for up to 5 minutes with 2 minutes for questions from the markers, if required. Presentations should not be shorter than 3 minutes." So, you will present individually (as you'll be marked individually) but in sequence as a group (as it's a presentation about a group project). I hope this answers your question. Don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page, if you need to ask me more about this, or since the conversation has been started her, you can leave a talk back banner at the bottom of my page leading me here. --ToniSant (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone, I transcribed the video "Expectancy Violation Theory Cody Drive" on my Sandbox page. It has general information about the Expectancy violations theory, so I thought you might find it useful! Irina Predescu (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

That's brilliant Irina, thank you! How're you getting on with the presentation? Are you ready for tomorrow ? :) DanielleForrester1991 (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]