User talk:DanieleJava

Edit warring at FBI files on Michael Jackson

Your recent editing history at FBI files on Michael Jackson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 22:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank your for your message.

Before making any changes, I've read the previous talk pages and it seems like the editors do not want to be neutral on the topic. I have now opened a new talk page on the issue, but I'm not sure it will lead to any improvement on the situation, especially because the editors are mostly fans of Michael Jackson and are deleting anything that could shed shadows on their idol. Even the documents they've cited have been presented partially, avoiding any page about wrongdoings.

Can you somehow bring this to the attention of some moderator? This thing goes on since 2020. DanieleJava (talk) 22:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing the right thing by discussing it on the talk page. Now stay there and don't make anymore edits on that topic until there is a consensus to change the status quo version. Now you need to be patient, not make any accusations, assume good faith, and not use primary sources. We primarily depend on secondary sources to avoid original research and cherry-picking. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General Sanctions Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Michael Jackson. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

<