User talk:Daniel wash

Speedy deletion of Satcom System

A tag has been placed on Satcom System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ormers (talk) 13:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilat

Please stop creating this article. It is quite clear that you are associated with the company and are attempting to use Wikipedia to publiscise it. This is not what Wikipedia is for (WP:ADVERT). Doing it using several different accounts (Daniel wash, Daniel washington, Dzzz, John wish and Lkahan) is also unacceptable (WP:SOCK). Please stop. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 04:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daniel wash. You have new messages at Ormers's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Daniel wash (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)you are wrong please advice how should i promote this noble concept of over coming the digital divide via satellite communication[reply]

As I said, it's clear that you are involved in the company, so you are advised not to contribute to an article on the subject. If it is so notable then someone not connected with the company will start an article on it. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 20:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My answer remains the same as the one above. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 20:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]