User talk:Daniel Of Winnipeg

January 2023

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Maverick Party, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Daniel Of Winnipeg. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 21:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

towing the company line 😒😮‍💨 I guess my question was answered. Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 02:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blocked you indefinitely for refusing to declare your conflict of interest, as required by WP:COI. --Yamla (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also unethically blocking me wont make me go away. Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to advertise, I'm trying to bring accuracy to political pages, you guys need new lines Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daniel Of Winnipeg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block was unnecessary Im not trying to advertise parties, Im trying to bring accuracy to political pages. I can appreciate that some media agencies have been considered reliable, however its becoming clear some articles from these agencies are becoming politically bias. also i would like to add that all of my political edits are objective, like I said Im not trying to advertise.Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not really sure your English language proficiency is good enough to edit English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daniel Of Winnipeg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block was unnecessary Im not trying to advertise parties, Im trying to bring accuracy to political pages. I can appreciate that some media agencies have been considered reliable, however its becoming clear some articles from these agencies are becoming politically bias. also i would like to add that all of my political edits are objective, like I said Im not trying to advertise Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Repeating the same request that was declined is never a good strategy. You need to specifically speak to the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daniel Of Winnipeg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel not only is blocking me for "conflict of interest" Is unnecessary but also an attack on me personally for bringing up concerns about "reliable sources" that are being used. Although one may support something, doesn't mean one can't view it objectively. I have never made edits that advertises in anyway. Side note i have to say I'm very disappointed in how Wikipedia mods carry themselves and communicate with the public.Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In my recollection nobody has ever gotten unblocked attacking anyone, whether a specific individual or a group. And that isn't going to change with this one (Side note: It's "advertise" in the plural). — Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Daniel Of Winnipeg (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 00:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]