User talk:Daniel Freeman

Welcome!

Hello, Daniel Freeman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Phr (talk) 08:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, re your question about the Sam Sloan article, the answer is there was a community discussion a few months ago about whether to delete the article (that happens pretty normally with biographical articles when the subject isn't very famous). The result of the discussion was to NOT delete the article. Of course someone could renominate it but nobody seems to want that right now.

You can review the old discussion at:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Sloan (2nd nomination)

There was an even earlier discussion that was withdrawn by the nominator before it closed:

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sam Sloan

("Votes for deletion" was the old name for the "Articles for deletion" process, though it was never really a voting process).

I just thought you might find that interesting, either to see what people thought of the Sloan article, or to see how that aspect of the Wikipedia editorial process works.

Regards

Phr (talk) 08:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A message from "soberknight"

I've decided to give you the standard "conflict of interest" notice even though you have been following the rules anyway. If you don't want to see it, you can just delete it.

I've always enjoyed chessgames.com. My first Wikipedia edit was to this page. I especially like to follow the games against the grandmaster. I'm sure even you have been surprised by the popularity of these events. Anyway...

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Shalom ^Hello 01:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]