Jump to content

User talk:Daniel E. Romero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Daniel Romero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Rory096 20:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your many fine contributions to articles about districts and neighborhoods of Los Angeles, California, I present you this barnstar on behalf of the Wikipedia community. Thanks for your help. Cheers, -Will Beback 09:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Westside (Los Angeles County)

[edit]

We need Sources for Westside (Los Angeles County). Can you help? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Congratulations, Daniel E. Romero, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!

Thank you for all the quality gnoming you've been doing most recently, and for your contributions to Los Angeles related articles now and in the past. Hope you keep up the great work :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tarshish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tarsus and Kingdom of Israel
East Hollywood, Los Angeles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Children's Hospital
Jeremiah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to God of Israel
Micah (prophet) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to God of Israel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

G-d template

[edit]

Hi Daniel, I noticed in your edit to the Daniel article, your use of G-d instead of {{G-d}}. (Another editor came after you and changed each hyphen to a letter o.) FYI: There is a special Template:G-d for people who prefer to leave out the 'o' for religious or other reasons.
—Telpardec  TALK  22:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Westwood North Village, Los Angeles for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westwood North Village, Los Angeles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westwood North Village, Los Angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Judaism and masturbation

[edit]

Regarding your recent edits to this article. The gemara in Niddah does not say what you claim it does. I had to revert your edit in that section. Debresser (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic character of neighborhoods

[edit]

Hello. I notice that you have been editing articles about the neighborhoods in Los Angeles to omit the ethnic characteristics from the lead paragraphs of said articles, with (usually) edit summaries decrying the information as having "racial" overtones, or similar wording. Don't you agree that the ethnic character of a neighborhood is one of the district's most salient features? Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You responded to this comment at User_talk:GeorgeLouis#Ethnic_Character_of_Neighborhoods, and I also responded there, where I made a proposal. Let's keep talking over there. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New stuff at User_talk:GeorgeLouis#Ethnic_Character_of_Neighborhoods and at User:GeorgeLouis/Sandbox. GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Los Feliz, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin Hills (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent message. However, there appears to have been a misunderstanding: it was I who deleted the sentences on flexibility in halachah and white talletot, and another editor who reinstated them.

In my edit summary, I gave full reasons for my edit. Fuller reasons are as follows:

On the whole I agree that Sephardim do tend to a more lenient and "centrist" view of halachah, but there are exceptions: Zimmels, in his Ashkenazim and Sephardim, lists examples of "Sephardic strictness and Ashkenazic leniency" as well as the reverse. The more important point is that section in question was a list of specific customs and usages. It was not intended to set out the general intellectual methodology of the different communities, which would require an article in itself. (On the talk page of the article I did raise the question whether there should be a separate article on "Sephardic Judaism" about the intellectual approach of the communities.) Or if it is to go in this article, there should be a separate section, with full discussion and citation of sources: Zvi Zohar, "He'iru Pene Ha-mizraḥ", might be a good place to start. I agree with you that just saying "Sephardim are more reasonable" or words to that effect, without discussion or substantiation, is unencyclopaedic (and being reasonable is not a "custom"!).

On talletot, I know that plain white talletot are recommended by the Ovadia Yosef school. Also, many people wear "white on white" striped talletot on Rosh Hashanah and Kippur for Kabbalistic reasons, but some Ashkenazim do this as well. Traditionally, Spanish and Portuguese Jews wore silk talletot (which did have blue stripes); the Ben Ish Hai holds that wool is halachically preferable but says nothing about colours. Similarly, Spanish and Portuguese Jews wear them like a shawl with all four corners in front, while Syrian (and I believe Moroccan) Jews fold the two back corners over their shoulders like the Ashkenazim. All in all, the picture is too diverse to allow any meaningful statement about what "Sephardim" do about talletot.

I would welcome further discussion to improve the article; and I shall hold off reinstating my edit till we have tried to resolve it. I would be interested to know your views. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 10:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

East Side of LA

[edit]

I appreciate your looking at the article and all, but can we talk on the talk page about undue weight being given to eastsider.com's fairly idiosyncratic definition being given such prominence?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are asking. I am editing to reflect new information: The Silver Lake Neighborhood Council officially voted it is not the East Side, and those areas east of Downtown are the East Side. I am editing the article to reflect this. http://laist.com/2014/02/06/silver_lake_admits_that_its_not_the.php

Look at the list of neighborhoods that have been added to the list; e.g. Los Feliz, Atwater Village, and so on. This website, not even an online newspaper, theeastsider.com, made up a definition of the East side that's not supported by any reliable source at all, and yet the article now makes it seem like there's a legitimate dispute about this. There isn't. Mapping LA and every other reliable source in the universe says that the East side is East of downtown. The only reason the Silver Lake neighborhood council had to deny that is because the whole city was laughing at them for ever claiming that they were on the East side. There's not a dispute about this at all. Framing it as if there is is giving serious undue weight to the opinion of one unreliable source.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See alsos for LA regions

[edit]

These are all in the templates. Is there a good reason to duplicate them in duplicated see also sections?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you are referring to, but I see no great harm in having more than one internal link. Can you elucidate? GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I was asking about this and this.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images and school zoning

[edit]

Hi, Daniel! I took a look at this edit.

AFAIK they are zoned there. But, I removed it because West Hollywood Elementary now has a picture. Fairfax HS is not in the West Hollywood city limits, but West Hollywood ES is in the city limits. Usually I try to limit the pictures within articles to schools within the community.

The only time I made an exception is Meyerland, Houston but in this case reliable sources discuss the connection between Bellaire High and Meyerland WhisperToMe (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish editing question

[edit]

Daniel, do you edit the Spanish Wikipedia? If so, are you willing to add information to es:Distrito Escolar Unificado de Los Ángeles? WhisperToMe (talk) 12:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sephardic law and customs

[edit]

Thank you for your message.

I removed the references because the article concerns verifiable questions of halachah le-ma'aseh: in other words, what Sephardic laws and customs in fact are, and the historical development behind them. The general Sephardic approach to Judaism (such as different attitudes to secular learning and philosophy) is a far wider topic, which really deserves an article of its own. Entering this territory also comes perilously near to saying "look how much more reasonable we Sephardim are"; which I happen to agree with, but is not really an encyclopaedic fact!

I don't feel very strongly about this, and won't remove the references again if you really want them in, but I do not think they really belong. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 14:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardic Temple Tifereth Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Theological Seminary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rabbi David Fink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silver Lake, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Echo Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Daniel E. Romero. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Daniel E. Romero. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congregation Shaare Ratzon moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Congregation Shaare Ratzon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what do you mean it has no sources? i posted their website. what kind of sources do you mean? Daniel E Romero (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]