User talk:DanielSong39

Welcome!

Hello, DanielSong39, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PS2pcGAMER (talk) 06:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Jimmy Young (boxer)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, DanielSong39! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bboxingscene\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 06:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Lidge

Regarding your edits to the article Brad Lidge, the result of the series isn't particularly relevant to the facts that are provided. If a user is interested in the result of the series, he can click on the link to the series itself to see that information. Since the game wasn't a series clincher, the final result is only related to the Lidge article in passing. If you have any questions, I'm available at my talk page, or you can leave a message at the article talk and I will see it on my watchlist. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 20:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pleas stop adding irrelevant information to the above article. Your edits also contradicted one of the guidelines on punctuation by removing an en-dash. If you feel this information should be included, please discuss it first on the article talk page. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any more power or control over what goes in Lidge's article than you do; that being said, the addition of the Yankees win isn't relevant to the facts in the article. If a reader is interested in knowing the outcome of the series, he can click the link that takes him to the 2009 World Series article. I certainly don't want to discourage you from contributing; quite the opposite. I just wanted you to understand why that particular information isn't exactly relevant to that specific article. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did respond to your comment at Talk:Brad Lidge as well. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cliff Hangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Katsu!, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Katsu!" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 19:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DanielSong39. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DanielSong39. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]