User talk:Daniel4sw

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Judaism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Judaism was changed by Daniel4sw (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-28T00:28:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 00:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spiritism in Major Religious Groups

I think you will agree with the fact that Wikipedia needs reliable sources on controversial issues. So, I'll show you why I did such a edit.

First, new religious movement (NRM) is not entirely Christian. According to Britannica, NRMs have very diverse backgrounds[1].

Second, Spiritism is not always Kardecist spiritism (see Spiritism). In the "Major Religious Groups" article, it does not mean Kardecist spiritism alone, because it is NRM. Furthermore, the fact that Kardecist spiritism is not well received in Christianity[2] means Spiritism will hardly find its place in Christianity, at least in the mind of conservative Christians.

Please provide reliable sources to support your opinion. Just saying "stop editing" is not very convincing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeweaver (talk • contribs) 10:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Modern listings in Major religious groups

You can see a note in "Remarks" to support the controversial things you have deleted. If you need to express your opinion against it, adding your opinion and support it with citations (instead of deleting) would be far more beneficial to Wikipedia, in my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeweaver (talk • contribs) 10:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prods

Could you also put back the Carth Onasi page, or at least merge it back into the carachters page. Now theres just a link there saying: Main article: Carth Onasi and it links nowhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel4sw (talk • contribs) 00:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it for you but if you think it should be merged then you'll have to do that yourself. I'm not an editor of these articles and I'm not even interested in Star Wars games, I was just acting routinely as an administrator. Sarah 01:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 20:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further edit summaries of this nature will result in a block by an administrator. Cunard (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 21:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]