User talk:Daniel2500

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Doctor (Doctor Who), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. magnius (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Doctor (Doctor Who), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peter Kay's Britain's Got the Pop Factor..., did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. magnius (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who

Re: your post, you've actually illustrated the problem... they imply it, they do not categorically prove it. One thing we have to do here is make sure that any information in an article is verifiable through reliable sources. We can't publish our own thoughts, opinions, or conclusions. --Ckatz^chat _spy 19:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As well, please stop restoring the material, as you may run afoul of the three revert rule. Your text has now been removed by two different editors, so the onus is on you to seek consensus for inclusion on the talk page. I'd be ahppy to point you towards more information regarding this if you like. --Ckatz^chat _spy 20:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]