User talk:Danholmesdxb

Welcome!

Hello, Danholmesdxb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Professional mastermind network service, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Professional mastermind network service

A tag has been placed on Professional mastermind network service, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious if there should be a title change to this article? Maybe if I suggest a name change here to mastermind group as an alternative choice. If the discussions indecate doing so, please advice how to do this and or complete for articles author, thanks.Danholmesdxb (talk) 07:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest version of Professional mastermind network service appears to be MUCH better than the previous version. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 04:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Professional mastermind network service has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): [a-z][0-9]+\.photobucket\.com/albums/.*\.(?:jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg) (links: http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk195/arielsblog/mastermind.jpg). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

How can I get some help from other wikipedians to cleanup and suggestion on making this article better referanced as while as more notability?
How can the article better state a case for the differance between Professional network service and this article in the context that mastermind group sites are being used in regards to the articles WP:lead in the encyclopedia? Fellow wikipedians maybe able to further copyedit the article to increase the notibility with some time. Danholmesdxb (talk) 23:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag but you did not post a question. Please write out your question and when you are done, place back the tag. I or someone else will be along to help. Alternatively, you can join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. (Click here for instant access). X clamation point 04:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following (appropriately named of course) templates will help. Place these tags on the article page itself:

{{cleanup}} for general cleanup
{{unreferenced}} if the article has no references OR {{improve references}} if the article has references, but more are needed
{{notability}} for articles which do not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline

I'm not sure I understand your second question though. That is why I'm leaving the {{helpme}} template there.

Hope that helps. --Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 00:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you might want to give other editors a note on the article's talk page if there is something more to say rather than just placing a template on the article. For example, Professional network service talk page is at Talk:Professional network service. If a section doesn't already exist, you should place your comment in a new section on that talk page. --Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 00:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll answer the first question, and I think this answer should help you to get an answer to your second question. You might want to try asking at a relevant Wikiproject, one that relates to business management or something along those lines. Members of Wikiprojects focus specifically on articles within their scope, and should be able to help you work on that article more easily than a random passerby like myself would. If that doesn't work (and give it a little bit of time) then you may want to ask members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check for help and tips on finding more references. Hope this helps; good luck! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]