User talk:DangerousGame

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangerousGame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why is this happening? I didnt use socking, it must be a coincidence that someone saw that "I" did just because Im using a shared proxy. Please help.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; since this was a checkuser-based block someone with access to that tool will have to review the evidence. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Excuse me?

I need answers. please!

Unblock, again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangerousGame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

seriously, methinks this happened cause my Ip was caught up in this, because "others" share a proxy server with me!

Decline reason:

No, you can't get unblocked by threatening to make more socks. Max Semenik (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I dont want to make another account!

That is why this account cannot stay permablocked!

Unblock me please.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangerousGame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ABSURD! My edits werent vandalism, i did not threaten to make a sock, dont even kno y this is happening to me.

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuser of multiple accounts. Revoking talk page access. only (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Standard administrators do not have access to the Checkuser tool and thus, as has already been stated to you, they cannot overturn Checkuser-based blocks. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blossum (The Powerpuff Girls) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blossum (The Powerpuff Girls). Since you had some involvement with the Blossum (The Powerpuff Girls) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 03:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blossum (Powerpuff Girls) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blossum (Powerpuff Girls). Since you had some involvement with the Blossum (Powerpuff Girls) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 03:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blossum (The Powerpuff Girls) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blossum (The Powerpuff Girls) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blossum (The Powerpuff Girls) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 03:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]