User talk:Dandelion4U

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sarah Hasted has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sarah Hasted was changed by Dandelion4U (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889288 on 2016-07-02T00:10:47+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Hasted

Bear in mind that Sarah Hasted isn't "your" article, and you don't have editorial control over it. Please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Please be aware that no one is permitted to use copyrighted images on Wikipedia (which have all been deleted by now) unless they have been released under an acceptable free license.

The fact that you may own the copyright is irrelevant. You are not the publisher here, the Wikimedia Foundation is. The Wikimedia Foundation has no permission to reproduce copyrighted images, and such permission cannot be granted by a Wikipedia user account. See WP:CONSENT for more information about donating copyrighted material. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Sarah Hasted shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please read the article talk page to understand why I removed the external links: Talk:Sarah_Hasted

It seems extremely likely that you have a conflict of interest so please read our conflict of interest guideline wp:coi which, among other things, says that you should not be directly editing the article but proposing changes on the article talk page. I intend to enforce this, and further edits to the article directly, unless you can demonstrate that you do not have a conflict of interest, will result in a block.--S Philbrick (Talk) 12:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GoldenRing (talk) 08:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]