User talk:Danceyman

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Quincy Regional Airport, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Quincy Regional Airport. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 20:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT before editing airport articles. HkCaGu (talk) 20:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to T. F. Green Airport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. For the second time, please familiarize yourself with WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT and learn how routes are listed. HkCaGu (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately you are misusing flightstats.com. In airport articles we have specific formats and guidelines. We list destinations (with specific disambiguation formats so that "New York" and "Washington" are not allowed) under the actual flying carrier in relation to the parent marketing airlines. Just because the same flight is listed under multiple carriers does not mean it is to be listed under multiple carriers and codeshare partners. HkCaGu (talk) 07:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Taunton School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cornelia Mooswalder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cornelia Mooswalder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Prestonmag (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Cornelia Mooswalder, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

The recent edit you made to Lou Albano constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Free Bear (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Axl Rose, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|reason= Listen I'm really sorry about what happened with my account, but here's the whole story, I was having a party, I'd left my mates alone, they hacked all my accounts including wikipedia, and spammed loads of pages, I've been a member of wikipedia for a long time, and it's been my ambition to become a administrator, please unblock me, I want to edit again, last year, I didn't do any edits, because I was very busy last year, and forgot about it, my mates have only hacked my account twice, and one of my friends another time, I'm not responsible for my actions and am very upset at this comment, two years ago, I helped extend the airport data in alaska, and even though I made some mistakes, my edits were highly constructive, I've wanted to move into the music area and help out with that, the only time I've been hacked was in february, where one of my friends deleted the whole of lou albano I believe, and in november when I was banned the reason was stated in my last appeal, I have so much to give, but I'm being held back by this ban, I didn't do any edits last year, however I did create a page which was called cornelia mooswalder which despite being under the threat of speedy deletion managed to overcome it, it's not about what I did last year it's what I've done in the time I was here, and in the time I was here, I've done my best i just don't want to spend the rest of my busy life blocked, because the little time I do have enjoying myself is when I do hold the occasional party or when I do have the time to edit wikipedia, and I have much more time this year, so don't hold me back, I made a mistake with Taunton School a few years ago and I'll take responsibility for that, but I'm a good wikipedian Danceyman 10:44, 4 January 2012 ~~~~}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danceyman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Listen I'm really sorry about what happened with my account, but here's the whole story, I was having a party, I'd left my mates alone, they hacked all my accounts including wikipedia, and spammed loads of pages, I've been a member of wikipedia for a long time, and it's been my ambition to become a administrator, please unblock me, I want to edit again and create and help benefit wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danceyman (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

Apparently, your mates hack your account quite frequently. In fact, going back a year, I can't seem to find any constructive edits. Kuru (talk) 02:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

-->{{unblock|reason= Last year, I didn't do any edits, because I was very busy last year, and forgot about it, my mates have only hacked my account twice, and one of my friends another time, I'm not responsible for my actions and am very upset at this comment, two years ago, I helped extend the airport data in alaska, and even though I made some mistakes, my edits were highly constructive, I've wanted to move into the music area and help out with that, the only time I've been hacked was in february, where one of my friends deleted the whole of lou albano I believe, and in november when I was banned the reason was stated in my last appeal, I have so much to give, but I'm being held back by this ban, I didn't do any edits last year, however I did create a page which was called cornelia mooswalder which despite being under the threat of speedy deletion managed to overcome it, it's not about what I did last year it's what I've done in the time I was here, and in the time I was here, I've done my best i just don't want to spend the rest of my busy life blocked, because the little time I do have enjoying myself is when I do hold the occasional party or when I do have the time to edit wikipedia, and I have much more time this year, so don't hold me back, I made a mistake with Taunton School a few years ago and I'll take responsibility for that, but I'm a good wikipedian Danceyman 10:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC) ~~~~}}

Sorry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danceyman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Listen, I made a mistake leaving my computer on for all to see, and I've finally come to sense to see that I had been an idiot, and it wasn't my friends fault for hacking it, if I hadn't left it on, it would've never happened, but don't hold it against me, I will only edit wikipedia for the better, if I don't, ban me again, simple as that

Decline reason:

Did you leave it in July last year, too? Max Semenik (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danceyman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Max Semenik, that was my friend Dave, I accept responsibility for that too, I'm sorry okay, if there's a problem ban me again, please, I'll never do anything unconstructive, just give me another chance

Decline reason:

WP:GOTHACKED. WP:EBUR. This account cannot be unblocked. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.