User talk:Dancerman2008

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Chris19910 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Speedy deletion of Humanbeings.scribblewiki

A tag has been placed on Humanbeings.scribblewiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Humanbeings

This page is currently under construction and hasnt been finished yet. Please remove the tag before I do. Dancerman2008 (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No notability is asserted, and at this time this is mainly an advertisement. I see no confirmation that the real jimbo wales is an admin there, as each and every wiki will allow a user of that name without questioning. And frankly, i think that jimbo being an admin there is as notable as making an article about his favorite tea cup (Knowing notable doesn't make notable) :). In short, i will not remove the tag until the article is WP:N, and isnt an advert. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Humanbeings.scribblewiki

A tag has been placed on Humanbeings.scribblewiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 20:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Humanbeings.scribblewiki

A tag has been placed on Humanbeings.scribblewiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Warnings(s)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Humanbeings.scribblewiki. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KurtRaschke (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Humanbeings.scribblewiki

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Humanbeings.scribblewiki, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism-only

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
For the previous version of page, please see here.
(see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks)

Ian Cairns (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dancerman2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Maybe if the people on wikipedia could actually read the article that I was creating it clearly said that it was under construction. I mean how much more obvious do you need to make it? I do not accept this block and if not unblocked will just create sock puppets to evade the block so if you dont unblock me I will just use another computer to create them. You can only block this IP address for 24 hours because I will have a new one issued to me by the internet service provider and I will make sure that Jimbo gets to hear about how the volunteers at wikipedia just block you for creating an article which has the proper "Under Construction" label on it. I was planning on using wikipedia for my homework but now I think I will use the other website or just use my Entartica provides the exact same info and you dont get blocked for creating a page with the under construction tag on it.

Decline reason:

Threats of sockpuppetry? No thank you. Talk page also protected. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.