User talk:Danbedford

This page is no longer a redirect to "DNxHR" as "DNxHR" should redirect to "DNxHR codec", which has now been implemented. I've removed this tag from the page since it's no longer relevant as the redirects were just going in the wrong direction. This page should be considered encyclopedic, as any marketing speak from Avid's blog post announcing the new DNxHR codec have been stripped, and only preliminary information and technical specifications have been added to the page.Danbedford (talk) 19:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

its all fine, the notice was removed and I replaced the primary source with a secondary source (as articles shouldn't be all based on primary sources). I additionally put a under contruction tag to reflect that this is not the final sate of the article, my apologies Avono♂ (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]