User talk:Dananmohammad

Your editing on Muhammad in the Bible

The great deal of time you have spent on this article is going to go to waste unless you come up with citations to sources which make the statements you are putting in the article. These need to come from reliable sources, preferably academic. Right now I have to assume the article reflects only your personal views, which is insufficient authority. If you don't start citing the article I shall be forced to take it back to a much older version which at least had some citations. Mangoe (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Greek vowel letters were ommitted as was the practice of that time and area of the world to the level that any writing in Greek from the time of Jesus having vowels is an indication of forgery because Greek language died as a spoken language 150 years before Christ and was only used in writing for administrative purposes and in signs without vowel letters "

That's completely untrue. Where on earth are you getting this stuff?Stenen Bijl (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This statement is clearly mentioned in the book i cited Jesus the prophet of Islam who took it from the book of Keldani(Abdul ahad) Muhammad in Bible. My understanding that speaking the greek language died because the greek got massacred by the romans in 150 BC and before that too they were massacred by the goths.Both greek and latin languages are dead, The Goth (current europpeans) invasded europe and massacred the latin language treee speaking peoples (the Celts and the romans). The current europpean languages are derived fromn the gothic language family (the goth used to live in east europe east of Pitula river in poland. The roman historian Tacitusin his book in 50 BC Germanica describe the germanic tribes crossing the pitula river and the danube and entering europe for the first time in history. Before that the europpeans had black hair and black eyes (hence the term black iris the survivers of the goth onslaught on europe the Volkerwandering.

Sorry the news reached youy late 1500 years. /* Your editing on Muhammad in the Bible */ references are the first citation you see after a statement, u might have to keep reading auntil u reach the citationDananmohammad (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hardly know where to start. First, Greek has vowels and always has. This is a fundamental difference between Greek and Latin orthographies on the one hand, and Arabic or Hebrew on the other. Secondly, Greek did not die out at any point, but is still spoken by tens of millions of people today. It was the prodominant language in the Eastern portion of the Roman Empire, and continued to be until the fall of Constantinople. This is why the gospels were written in Greek. The "Romans" of Islamic history are known in English as Byzantines and spoke Greek. The Greeks were never massacred by the Romans. Celtic languages aren't descended from Italic, but a sister branch. Nor did the Goths massacre the Romans. Latin languages did not die out, but evolved into Italian, French, Spanish, etc. The Goths are not current Europeans, but a branch of Germanic which is now extinct. No European language spoken today derives from Gothic. In sum, pretty much everything you say here is completely wrong.

I'm hoping that you'll follow up on what I've said here, and, when you realize that I'm telling you the truth, take the logical next step of realizing that you can't rely on the people you're reading for anything else, either. Until then, frankly, I think you shouldn't be editing anything at all. Take a few years to educate yourself – real education, not the garbage you've been reading – and come back.Stenen Bijl (talk) 22:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The celtic languages are from the Latin language tree, they are survived in small pockets of populations (dubbed the black irish people) Europe was the homeland of celt and latin untill 500 AD, from 500-700 Ad was the walkerwandering of the Goth in europe . The goths came from central asia with blue eyes and red skin. the home land of current europpeans the goth is in china (taklamakan desert) where the Noah fllod happened on them and they kept traveling west ever since (flood 3000 BC, 5000 years ago). The celts were haplogroup I and J. Haplogroup I is restricted to europe, while haplogroup R of the caucasians Goth is found all over northern lands in eurasia. The blue eyes mutation happened in a woman in central asia R maternal haplogroup, while the male caucasians original homeland is in Guinea Papau the aboriginies have same caucasian skuls ( big jew wide distance between mouth and nose, archic eye brows , sunken eyes,.R is a branch of K haplogroup of the aboriginies of Genea Papau, K is restricted to genea papau and eustralia aboriginies (red race).

Europpeans have the highest level of colored eyes in the world central asia too, so europpeans came from asia (they were in Eukraine up till 500 AD, before 500 BC they were in the caucasus, before that they were in Scandia where we waited for the flood waters to dry up in central asia, before that they were in TaklaMakan desert where there was a huge fresh water lake before the flood. the caucasian mummies testify to that, found in china dated 2000 BC The Titans (over 6 feet tall) Prime minister of england benjamin desraeli celebrated the caucasian race ( because they came from caucasia that was named after thems (the goth AKA gog and magog). The europpean languages are all branches of the gothic language. The closest languages to the mother Gothic is english and yiddish. Latin is a dead language and the survivers of the romans and greek are living in Turkey and Syria.I removed the notion that greek died 150 BC even though it is found in the two reference books I provided)since it is not part of the topic, but greek was written without vowels at that time. The roman were the trojans (a semetic people cousin of the arabs) they were uprooted by the greek. The byzantine empire was roman not greek they spoke latin. after the demise of the Latin peoples on the hand of the goth, greek took control of the Empire untill the Ottomans revived the Romans because Ottomanli were Roman converts Markos ogli and his brother in a ddition to the sultan. that family was majority roman with little turk blood in it. they ruled untill the 20th century. There are hardly romans in rome now. the romans now are in turkey and syria. and the greek too. there is hardly J2 in greece now. the majority R of the goth and E of the slaves of the greek. The franks and the english are both Engli goth tribe. Free-anges the franks were called when they were freed on the bridge in Frankfurt (frank-fort) where the freed angles were allowed to cross into france Romans were J1 like the arabs and small pockets exist in the mountains in central italy. It took a thousand year to build rome but the goth destroyed it in a day. The true greek are the muslims of greece and in adianpole in turkey.

Based upon this post, I believe you are the ideal Wikipedia editor. The philosophy being that anyone can edit, you're surely anyone in a way that neither I nor anyone I know could ever be. Wikipedia richly deserves your continuing contribututions; carry on.Stenen Bijl (talk) 07:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I may be blunt

We have tried and tried to work with you on this. Yet you intransigently keep going back to your lengthy and defective text when we've explained, over and over, what is wrong with it. If there is some scholarly work about what Muslims think about Mohammed being referred to in the Bible, then we would be very pleased to help you turn it into an article, or if there isn't enough of it, to fit it into some other article where it is appropriately mentioned. But what you are doing will never be acceptable: Wikipedia will never incorporate an article which has you arguing for these mentioned directly from scripture, whether it be the Bible, the Koran, Hadith, or for that matter even the church fathers or the Talmud. these are primary sources which require interpretation, and we do not want your interpretation. If you can find an academic source (not some random website) that says, "Muslims believe thus and so," and you can cite it, then this statement can be used as the basis of an article.

What you are doing will not do. If you revert to your long and unacceptable version again, we will be forced to take steps to prevent you from editing this article. Mangoe (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quran and Hadith is scholarly work dated 600 AD, they were published many times over since then.

The quran clearly says in the verses that they find Muhammad in the ancient holy scriptures.

This article is for the muslims to fill since neither christians and jews admit to thst neither any body else other than muslims. there are many articles in wikipedia about verses in the Old testament foretelling jesus, why don't you purge them too since Paul and Peter are not scholars in your opinion. and who made you the guardians of who is scholar or not? what credentials do you have? there is a lot of polemic against islam in this wikipedia. if you don't like this article because it is polemic then you have to purge all the polemic statements in wikipedia if you are the guardians of wikipedia. if you are not the guardians of wikipedia, then you are bullying and discriminating against muslims. you have benn deleting everything under charges no reliable sources or original research.

I have deleted any original research.I remind you are responsible of your actions and I could sue you even if u are in the north pole.Dananmohammad (talk) 06:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have all the time in the world. I have provided at least 2 references for every statement and there are no original research.Dananmohammad (talk) 06:55, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion about you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. May I also point out that you should not make legal threats, such as threatening to sue editors fo libel, as you have just done. This can lead to the blocking of your account. See WP:NLT. Paul B (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You(few editors) remove my long edit why? how do you know 6 billion people minds ? what if they like details? what minds you? who are you? do you own this place? then what in the world ??? As long any statement is verified by one reliable source then it stays on wiki! this is the rule. I bring more than two to each and every sentenser I put . I can bring up to a hundred reliable sources to every sentence. Did wiki contract with some organization to lease 40% of its info to them? or what is the deal here? this is open source encyclopedia. I don't have time to collect info and make edit war at the same time. Obviuosly you cut the info of the other side so that you are always winning . Then why don't you talk to your self in the mirror?Dananmohammad (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Muhammad in the Bible may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Muhammad in the Bible may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit-warring and making legal threats (see this diff), as you did at Muhammad in the Bible. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Dananmohammad/sandbox

User:Dananmohammad/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dananmohammad/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dananmohammad/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]