User talk:Danaide

Welcome!

Hello, Danaide, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Alientraveller (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Valkyrie (film) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib) 18:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Valkyrie (film) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. ^LeaveSleaves 19:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me. Sleaves or slaves is a global difference in categorie._ and if there are visible mistakes or missunderstandings in a film

like "Valkyrie" I think WIKI should stand such a folie of theses and receptions. I studied Media and I don't want to go in the "Führers kindergarten" pretrending not to see and recognize. That would mean asking on such a topic, to me. It#s a bachelor or a master? and there are failures visible. Asking for a gender politic folie is a global question!--Danaide (talk) 13:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Angels & Demons (film) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 15:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know exactly what is meant with general . To discuss structure and tensionlines means a nescessary analyse of the topic to me. How to frame a theme like it is given in ILLUMINATI? another important question. Mixing the film and moral attitudes isn't scientific work; most of the discussion means mixing and not differenceiating.

Mhm. Failure, error or missunderstanding from my point of view?--Danaide (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Die Another Day for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 01:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me, but I think it#s not inappropriate, just another point of view and a scientific one. Please don't play power without arguments!--Danaide (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to WP:NOT: Wikipedia is not a forum. Adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Also, I am wondering if you even know what you are talking about. "Scientific"? Since when does discussing movies on talk pages become "scientific"? There is little to argue about; WP policy is enforced, this is no "power play", according to your personal opinion. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 08:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Shutter Island (film) for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. Wikipedia is neither a discussion group nor a blog. The purpose of talk pages here is to discuss the associated article. They are not a place to post your personal opinions or feelings on the subject. You have been warned previously about this, please stop now.--DO11.10 (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I talked about what is written on the page. NOthing else! Them who pretend to be objective writing on a not reflected level, trying to stop again telling something of my point of view. Asking for a synopsis of a page is forbidden? no scientific and democratic frame in WIKI? I'm a little astonished what collar works.

Objectivating my subjective in relation to the content of the page means thinking! Following false norms isn't encyclopaedic, to me! Might power and no authority in acting on admin without a head or a heart.--Danaide (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lolwut. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 09:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]