User talk:Dan Koehl/2018

European History Question

Hello Mr. Koehl,

I am interested in European History and saw your name under the "Interested in European History" page. I had a couple of questions that I would like to ask specifically about the Elizabethan Era, and was hoping we would be able to have somewhat of a conversation. I was also wondering if you knew anyone who specialized in this field, as I am hoping to write a research paper on it. My main question is: How did Queen Elizabeth create a sense of national identity in England? I have been researching this topic and was hoping you would be able to provide some insight.

Thanks, -Andrew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Spana (talk • contribs) 18:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Not being an expert in British 17th century, but the fact that she was the Monarch during a long time may be one reason in itself. Also the issue with the Spaniards turned out well. But are you saying the national identity increased significantly during her time ? Many authors sets this "nationality awareness" to the 1848 Revolutions (and also the 1830 one). Hope this was worth something. Boeing720 (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

New message without header

Message from you - "Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to American Recordings (record label) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)"

reply...

Hello Dan, my recent contributions to the American Recordings (record label) were indeed constructive. The information under "New Artist" and "NEarly Life" in the article appear to be erroneously added SPAM, without any citations, and wholly unrelated to the American Recordings Record Label.

The first line of the "New Artist" section reads - "Robert Quintanillo Olivores has been signed to Warner Music Group ..."

This is added without citation firstly, and secondly Warner Music Group is a competitor of American Recordings' parent company, Universal Music Group. This information is probably better suited for Robert's personal Wikipedia page, which there is none(probably on account of all of the spamming with no citations).

Thank you for taking the time to read my message. Going forward I will once again delete this information from the article, but I will add a description into my edit. Do you have any other tips for going about editing pages and not getting caught in the STiki tool? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.85.109.113 (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Pinging users

Thanks for the ping at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Genealogy. I happened to spot it because you thanked me on the same page. However, you may not be aware that inserting a ping does not alert the other editor unless there is a fresh signature. See Wikipedia:Notifications for (lots) more details. Best wishes – Fayenatic London 19:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Tarana Burke BLP edit

Just so you're aware: your reverting of 2600:1:f612:4b10:49fe:d5d6:da1c:6d50 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) at Tarana Burke re-inserted possibly-defamatory synthesis statements implying that Burke is making false statements. I've neutered some of it, but most of what you re-inserted is probably still improper synthesis based on isolated examples that none of the cited sources seem to claim to be a pattern. --Closeapple (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@Closeapple:, I just reverted a large removal of sourced text, but have no insight or interest in the subject, sp please do what you want, as long as you do something good! Dan Koehl (talk) 02:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Style Louis XIV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leduc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

You wouldn't let me delete the information that I peraonally added in the past, yet the same information was removed by somebody elase on the Lake Norman, Mooresville, Sherrills Ford, Catawba River websiteds in whole or in part,

You wouldn't let me delete the information that I peraonally added in the past, yet the same information was removed by somebody else on the Lake Norman, Mooresville, Sherrills Ford, Catawba River websites in whole or in part, where it is arguably more relevant. 24.196.164.253 (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Marathon Enterprises

My father was undeniably instrumental in saving Sabrett in the 1980s, after Kurt Teitler died (Kurt was a good guy, and I even named my son agter him). To delete Hans Mueller's 40 years of service to Sabrett, where his nickname was "Horse" for his work ethic, and leadership, is shameful. [Yet, historical references to grandsons on other sites, like Terrell, C, are OK? ...a clear discriminatroy double standard! 24.196.164.253 (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Declined IP

I glanced at your report at AIV that another admin already declined. It seems you misread dates on the IP. It made vandalism edits in November 2016, not 2017. The edit you gave a final warning for is from NOvember 2016 and was already addressed by Wikishovel's warning from that time. only (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

True @Only:, thanks for the headsup. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Re Bankstown trainline

I never touched this page sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.17.87 (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Someone with your IP address did, accordinng to your edit summary. Dan Koehl (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Keala Settle

Kia ora Dan

With regard to your message to me about Keala Settle. The information about her mother's name is incorrect. Her name was Susanne Settle (nee MacDonald) not (nee Riwai) as stated on Keala's page.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.90.201 (talk) 20:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Maybe, and maybe not. As long as you van verify those records, I dont think anyone will object to your edits, Dan Koehl (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Reverted edits

You reverted two of my edits, calling them "unexplained" when I explained fully why I removed the two weather boxes/climate info. If you bothered to check the sources linked to you would see they do not link to any climate averages. Perhaps you could actually check things before simply reverting edits. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.11.105.246 (talk) 11 januari 2018 kl. 17.26‎

OK @46.11.105.246:, I will look into this. If you are right, I will of course apologize and revert my revert. Dan Koehl (talk) 10:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

There are no athiests in foxholes

Ted Williams was in the USA Air Force, nobody knows and he does not ever say that he was ever in a fox hole. It's irrelevant that Ted Williams be in this definition. If you include Ted Williams, then you should include all atheists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.103.185 (talk) 23:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018

^{The Fox Hunt (1893) by Winslow Homer, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.}
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.

== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Shane Balkowitsch page edits

Hi Dan, I made some anonymous edits to the Shane Balkowitsch page which I think are valid, and I felt I'd offered a sound and verifiable explanation. Rather than simply re-do them, though, I thought it wiser to message you. My edit was the result of a fact check:

• the claims I deleted are all supported, when you unwind it, purely by statements made by Shane Balkowitsch to the press.
• the end result (a portrait in the National Portrait Gallery) is checkable by searching the institution's web site, and comes up in the negative.

There are some ways Mr. Balkowitsch's claims could be true (perhaps the NPG is still considering including the work) but as it stands now these claims appear to fall in the unverifiable zone, by some reasonable standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amolitor99 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough @Amolitor99:, and thanks a lot for taking the time informing me, but would you mind follow the somewhat tiresome routine of discussing this on the talk page, just to get this properly overlooked, so other users may get insight in your thinking, and if nessecary, submit their opinion? Thanks, Dan Koehl (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Absolutely. You know, I looked and looked for the Talk tab last night, but either it moved to the left (some time in the last decade) or I am old because I completely failed to see it and wondered "why isn't there a talk tab any more?" but I see it now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amolitor99 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utilisateur:Lewisiscrazy

Hi, just thought I'd let you know I closed this AfD you opened. It was a misplaced userpage... "Utilisateur" is the French word for "User". I moved the page to the User namespace... all is well. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Dispute resolution Climate Weather Box

Dear Wikipedian,

Given the lack of consensus on the inclusion of a weather box for the Selsey article talk page, I have requested a dispute resolution.

Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Selsey#Climate Edit War

Best Regards Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Djm-leighpark:, I made a comment, supporting your suggestion. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations from WP:STiki!

		The Silver STiki Barnstar of Merit
		Congratulations, Dan Koehl! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 10,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Regarding the Martian Moons Exploration page

There's already a citation (currently the 6th reference on the page) - https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/11/20/nasa-confirms-contribution-to-japanese-led-mars-mission/

"The NASA-funded instrument — named MEGANE, meaning “eyeglasses in Japanese — will measure the elemental composition of Phobos by detecting neutrons and gamma-rays emitted from the small moon, scientists said." 146.229.246.70 (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

DMOZ user category

Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 January 25. – S. Rich (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Srich32977: for the message. Dan Koehl (talk) 08:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

China

Hey- I see you are the 106th user on wikipedia, so must have seen it all by now. I was wondering if you would be willing to do some of your magic in the Chinese articles. Here are some pages I have done some work with:~~ Wuhan, List of township-level divisions of Hubei, Huanggang ~~minor articles that may need more citiations: Fengdu Ghost City, Huanggang Normal University~~ general contibutions: [1]. Thanks for any help! I invite you to be as strict as you can so that I can avoid making the same errors in the future~! Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Thank You
		Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Dan Koehl, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Congregation of the Holy Spirit

Dear Dan Koehl,

I am new to Wikipedia and currently trying to make some useful changes to two pages : Congregation of the Holy Spirit and Holy Ghost Fathers. I am having some difficulties since what i want to change is the title of the article. In fact, the congregation (of which i belong) has often be called "Holy ghost fathers", but the officially recognized name is "Congregation of the Holy Spirit". We would like to change the page of the congregation to "Congregation of the Holy Spirit" instead of the other which is not accurate any more. But everytime i try to change something, i got automatic cancellation... please help me in that matter. Thanks a lot Salipunan (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Dear @Salipunan:, I guess the easiest thing to do is a redirect, hwever, it seems this should first undergo discussions, in order to see to that such a redrect would be supported by consensus, and not only by you. My advice is therefore to bring this matter to the talk page of the article you want to drasticaly change, and on that talk page argue for your opinion and give otheres the possibity of input. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Dan Koehl. You have new messages at Kwekubo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dear AWB'er

I noticed over at the Portals WikiProject that you have or use AWB (or JWB).

There are some tasks that have turned up that are perfect for AWB.

We have many new portals, and they need:

1. To have a {{Portal}} template placed in the See also section on the corresponding root article, outline article, and index article.
2. A {{Portal}} template placed on the corresponding category page.
3. A link placed at the end (in the "bottom" section) on the corresponding navigation template. For an example, see Template:Birds.

The new portals can be found on Category:Single-page portals along with some revamped ones. You'll need to use the skip feature of AWB.

If you have any questions, please {{ping}} me, and ask them below.    — The Transhumanist   01:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Legal

I would like to hide the legal issues of Hugo Ferreira at this point and time.. that is all I want until court dates approach, I would like it hid.. the rest can stay... What do I need to do to make that happen for now Monkeycrabs (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @Monkeycrabs:, regarding the article about Hugo Ferreira the various accusations seem to be backed up by valid sources, therefore confirmed. There is in that sense, not NPOV to try to "hide" verified information. There may be other ways though, to apply for some sort of protection for the subject of the article, which I am presently not aware of. but I will try to find further information, which may be relevant in this case. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jonas Nordin

The article Jonas Nordin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. aNode (discuss) 14:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

haha @ANode:, I got blind, didn't even notice that I forgot the sources, now its corrected and valid. I will not remove the template myself though, maybe you would care to remove the template if you think the article looks OK now? Dan Koehl (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Looks solid, thanks for rectifying the issue! aNode (discuss) 15:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

updating information for the Islamic center of new england

Hello Friend!

I hope your day is going well! I just wanted to follow up on the edit update to the Islamic Center of New England page. My last submission updated the page for accuracy and to include the latest developments and programming, as much of the information on the page was out of date. I just want to make sure that our page is not only accurate, but also is objective- the previous information, particularly around the "controversy" portion is skewed and I'm worried about the repercussions for our community members. Thank you for your help :)

The updated submission for community access is as follows:

Community Access ICNE is a staple for Muslims throughout the greater Boston Area, many Muslim families and activists from around the city have made a tremendous effort to expand programming within the masjid to better serve community needs. These include:

- Lectures and Workshops: weekly lectures on a wide range of topics spanning from voting rights to child development take place at the center. The aim of this programming is to keep the larger community informed and up to date on information that impacts their daily lives.

- Youth Programming: multiple programs are run out of the center for children ages 5-18- these include summer camps, weekend programming, athletics, and programming for teens. Major goals of programming include aiding in the holistic development of young Muslims. Program coordinators work to ensure that children and teens are learning both skills to ensure their physical, intellectual, and spiritual health as well as affording children the tools to succeed academically and socially in the current socio-political climate.

- Community Events: occur typically on a monthly basis with a goal of bringing families together. These events range from celebration of holidays to sports tournaments to game nights. These events allow for a strengthening of the local community and ensure that families are given a supportive foundation from which to flourish.

- Community Outreach: ICNE members also make an effort to provide outreach and support to the larger Quincy community. One notable event that occurs every year is a backpack giveaway, in which Muslim volunteers purchase backpacks and school supplies for local children and host a community event in which families from across the city can come and enjoy a day of fun at the center. Children who attend each leave with a backpack full of school supplies for the upcoming school year.

Masjid leaders The Islamic Center of New England is run by a Board of Directors, with elections occurring at the end of every term. The BOD oversees subcommittees, which consist of community members who meet weekly about topics related to community outreach, youth programming ,religious programming, etc. All members of both the BOD and subcommittees are volunteers and receive no monetary compensation. Religious programming is directed primarily by the Imams. The current imams of the two mosques are Imam Khalid Nasr (Quincy Location) and Imam Abdul Rahman Ahmad (Sharon location). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.167.230.148 (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

¿vandalizar por colocar el resultado de los partidos, en lugar de W-L-D que no aporta nada?, y que ya queda señalado con una nota de color, y W=win; D0Draw y L=lost ¿Es una broma? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.125.12.152 (talk) 07:53, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Renewable resource

I think we got our counter-vandal reverts crossed on the Renewable resource article. I'll let you back out yours at your convenience. FiberTech (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

I went ahead and rolled it back to the un-vandalized version. Happy hunting. FiberTech (talk) 10:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot @Zachary Schr:, sorry for that mistake. Dan Koehl (talk) 10:09, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

"Vandalism or Not?"

Hi, Dan Koehl,

General question for you in good faith and with due respect, but I am just wondering why when (a) someone (not you necessarily, but anyone) deletes another's reasonable, informative, constructive and referenced contributions to a Wiki entry it is not necessarily considered as potential "vandalism", but almost all efforts to (b) undo the deletions by the original editor are often considered suspect and potentially "vandalism".

Mysterious if (b) is deemed vexatious, why (a) gets an automatic free ride.

Or maybe (b) should not be questioned as "vandalism" but merely as a legitimate measure by someone who sincerely believes the deletion of their own prior contributions was unwarranted or at least misguided.

Seems like a murky and contradictory business that I am at pains to grasp, in terms of standards and practices I am just trying to understand.

Please expatiate when time allows.

Thanks, Gavriel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.210.47.14 (talk) 14:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear Gavriel, with ip @205.210.47.14: I can understand your thoughts, and can only advice to read more about how to write, and add verifying sources. I wish you best success. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Dan. In appreciation, Gav. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.210.47.14 (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Careless reverting

I see from your contributions that you're one of those editors who loves reverting. And like many such editors, you revert at such a prolific rate that you are bound to make mistakes. If a "citation needed" tag has been attached to some text since 2007, then that text should be removed. You clearly either did not even look at, or did nor properly understand, the edit I made and the clear edit summary I left. Be more careful. 51.6.138.84 (talk) 20:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @51.6.138.84: without thousands of reverts every day, not much of editorial work would be left for people to read, so, unfortunately, this has to be taken care of, and sometimes at a fast rate, but I'm sorry if this is annoying you. But until alternative methods to protect the project from vandalism is developed, this will be the only method to repair the daily attacks of vandalism.

I think above you are referring to when you removed large parts of text, from Summit register with the summarize para waiting 11 years for a citation and unencyclopaedic following para? Dan Koehl (talk) 21:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

That, and I see that you also undid my edit to Cumans. You did both of these without bothering to explain why, apparently assuming they were vandalism when it was obvious they were not. That goes against policy and guidelines. Undoing vandalism is good, treating non-vandalism as vandalism is bad. There is no reason ever to do the latter. 51.6.138.84 (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @51.6.138.84:, We obviously define vandalism and careless reverting differently, and after seeing how you, once again removed an entire section from an article when you undid my revert, but how your action once again was reverted by @Shellwood:, another Wikipedia Patroller, and how you started an edit war with the comment: are you trolling or just careless? , and finally, your edit was reverted by User:AnomieBOT, I would suggest that you edit articles differently, otherwise this may happen again. I do believe you have good intentions, but it seems your edits cause problems in the flow, and especially during the peak hours when Wikipedia is under attack, and users are reverting fast all vandalism, such edits as removing an entire section in an article will possibly result in similar actions from others user users and Bots. From my side, I have no opnion regarding the different versions in the two articles you mention, I simply try to protect the Wikipedia from Vandalism. With this, I believe this case is resolved. Dan Koehl (talk) 05:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

I did not remove "an entire section". I removed an unencyclopaedic list, explaining why in the edit summary. Even if I had removed an entire section, that would make no difference. AnomieBOT did not revert my edit - it does not do that. It rescued references.

My edit was obviously not vandalism, yet you treated it as such. It now seems clear that you do not have a clear grasp of what vandalism is, and yet you revert frantically. You are bound to be making many more mistakes than just this one. Stop undoing edits unless you are prepared to take the time to determine what each and every one actually is. 51.6.138.84 (talk) 07:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Richard Bey

I don't understand why you would not find my revisions constructive. I AM Richard Bey. I understand some of your reversions...but others are just not clear depictions of my career and my life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Booky0024 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @Booky0024: IF you are Richard Bey, (something I can of course, not know) my advice is to avoid editing an article about yourself, please read more at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Dealing_with_articles_about_yourself.

In your edits, I can see that you removed images and large parts of text from the article, and then added text which was not verified, and has been removed by other users since then? Please read more about Wikipedia:Verifiability, I wish you happy editing. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Butia yatay

Hi. Sorry, couldn't figure out the talkback template. I believe your huggle thing had a false positive here. Likely due to the word 'nuts'. Please review your revision. Cheers, Leo 86.83.56.115 (talk) 23:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @86.83.56.115:, you are right, and I reverted my edit. Thank you for your work, and kind way of pointing out my error. Dan Koehl (talk) 05:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

About some other version supported by government of india

My edit summary = "About some other version supported by government of india)" is fairly explicit don't you think ? Cheers. 103.30.141.57 (talk) 11:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for commenting @103.30.141.57:, but just how does that sentence motivate a removal of an entire section (Lokpal Bill) of the article Jan Lokpal Bill? Dan Koehl (talk) 11:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

The Lokpal Bill and the Jan Lokpal Bill were 2 different draft legislations proposals. The article as it stands confuses ordinary readers. The usage of the official Seal of the Govt of India further confuses readers.103.30.141.57 (talk) 11:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Tulu is the most widely spoken language in Mangalore according to the 2001 census

Tulu is the most widely spoken language in Mangalore according to the 2001 census. This language has its own script and grammar. I kindly request you to not report false positive about the edit. 117.216.160.130 (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @117.216.160.130:, in the beginning of that article, theres a comment with the following text:

| demographics1_info1 = <!-- Don't add Tulu. It is not Administrative language yet-->,

indicating that there has been numerous biased edits by Wikipedia users, for some reason wants Tulu to be named as Administrative language, although it isnt yet. Please be patience regarding this issue, once the language gets official status, theres no problem to change the article. But as for now, further biased edits will be regarded as POV, edits will be reverted, and the users making an edit war will most probably become blocked. Dan Koehl (talk) 09:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, regarding the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International page edit, I thought that I did give a clear enough explanation in the comments for the removal of material. The material removed was discussed in the paragraph above. In particular, the SUAS competition is listed along with six other competitions (the number "six" was also a correction as the list was updated to include others not listed). The special paragraph concerning the SUAS competition was not only redundant, but it provided detail that was unbalanced with the rest of the article wherein the individual competitions are not broken out for detailed discussion. As with the International Aerial Robotics Competition, a special page has been established for detailed discussion. The same should be done for the SUAS competition as the current page under discussion is about the parent organization that sponsors the competitions, and is not focused on the details of those competitions. As such, I plan to revert your edit to reinstate my original edit because it improves the overall article and provides some corrections in the process. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.82.182.75 (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm not going into a discussion regarding the topic of the article. Such a large removal looked like vandalism, but if I made a mistake, I'm sorry. Normally such a large removal, together with large parts of fact box etc, should forego by a discussion on the talk page. In either way, this is an issue for users involved in the article, if you didn't vandalize, then my greatest worries are over. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

==

Hello, Dan Koehl. You have new messages at 73.82.182.75's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

==

See my comments/answers

AWB task request: please help with the backlog

Hey...

If you have AWB laying around, please dust it off and crank it up! ;)

We have a growing backlog!

There are now 545 portals. Of those, 52 are of the new design.

Many of the new portals are orphaned or near orphaned, and need links pointing to them:

1. A portal link at the bottom of corresponding navigation footer template. E.g., Template:Machines for Portal:Machines. See examples of a portals link at the bottom of Template:Robotics and Template:Forestry.
2. A {{Portal}} box in the See also section of the corresponding root article for each portal. If there is no See also section, create one and place the portal template in that. (Rather than placing them in an external links section -- they're not external links).
3. A {{Portal}} template placed at the top of the category page corresponding to each portal.

To make a list of corresponding templates, you can use AWB's make list feature to make a list of the pages in Category:Single-page portals. Then you copy that list to a sandbox, and replace \nPortal: with ]]\n* [[Template:, using WP:wikEd. That will give you a list of templates to work on. Then you set skip in AWB to skip the ones that already have the portal link.

To make a list of corresponding root articles, make a list of portal links, and then remove "Portal:" from the links.

To make a list of category links to process, make sure you use a leading colon (:) in the category links, like this: [[:Category:Blue Öyster Cult]].

All new and revamped portals can be found at Category:Single-page portals.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   20:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Tornadoes of 2018 Edits

Hi, I know those edits look non-constructive, but I am simply removing the non-significant tornado events from the page and replacing them with more relevant and prudent information. I am I appreciate your concern, but these old articles need updating to be more consistent with the more recent tornado pages which only list significant events. I am sourcing my work, so please do not revert again. Thanks TornadoInfo (talk) 23:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)TornadoInfo

OK @TornadoInfo:, I have to believe you and appreciate your work, but please remember, always write a describing summary when you remove large pieces of text. Dan Koehl (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Will do.

TornadoInfo (talk) 00:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)TornadoInfo

Speedy deletion declined: Olga Fadeïeva

Hello Dan Koehl. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Olga Fadeïeva, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being part of a national team indicates significance. Also, 2004 FIVB World Grand Prix squads is a valid redirect target per WP:ATD. Thank you. SoWhy 09:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

"Kaam" Wikipedia Page

Hi Dan - first up, I am new to Wikipedia editing and apologies upfront for doing anything "out of turn". The existing page for "kaam", a Hindi word, correctly talks about it as being one of Sikhism sins but is misspelled - should be either "kam" or "kama" which is also the sanskrit meaning.

"kaam" actually means "work" in Hindi and I was trying to edit the same on the page. We can move the current contents of "kaam" to a new page called "kam" or "kama" but "kaam", to stay true to its definition, simply refer to a translation of "work" in hindi.

Please check out the following link to firm up the above claim and help me correct this reference: https://www.google.co.in/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enIN805IN805&ei=D3OjW56qOI-v9QOv2JuICw&q=kaam+meaning+in+english&oq=kaam+meaning+in+&gs_l=psy-ab.3.0.0l7j0i22i30k1l2j0i22i10i30k1.197702.199586.0.200549.16.12.0.0.0.0.289.1706.0j5j3.8.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..8.8.1703...0i10k1.0.0QVVDCv_VS8

Appreciate any help you can provide in helping on making this change.

Best, Nilesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nparwani (talk • contribs) 11:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear @Nparwani:, in this case, you may be right, and you may be wrong. But one thing for sure, Google is not a valid source. on your talk page, I have inserted some good links as to how to edit on Wikipedia, and how to use sources, and which, correctly, and I think after reading that, you will have better possibilities to change an article, that other regarded as correct, since it was created back in 2006. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Dan Koehl. You have new messages at Nparwani's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

citation on article

hi Dan I am new on wikipedia and still need to familiarise myself with editing and contributing documents on this platform. I have not included a citation on my article. i am writing information based on oral history but there are some parts which i will include that have references, I guess in that case i will have to put proper citation processes. I am writting and publishing as i collect information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.28.104.66 (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.148.174.11 (talk) 18:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

really @93.148.174.11:? can you please give a link or a diff, to the one you are referring to? Dan Koehl (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're in before me half the time right now. Nice to know someone else is watching right now. Jerod Lycett (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Jerodlycett:, but good to know you are there also! :) Dan Koehl (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

WTC in film

I'm not vandalizing anything. I'm removing original research and unverifiable junk. See the remarks at the top of my talk page, and then tell me what you believe I'm deleting that I shouldn't. 24.7.14.87 (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Uno

American articles get American spelling. Brit articles get Brit spelling. Look up basic wiki rules. Uno is an American dog so he gets American spelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:5800:F500:E90D:9570:BE1F:C25B (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

@2600:8805:5800:F500:E90D:9570:BE1F:C25B:, what is an American article? If a dog, mentioned in an article, is living in America, does it make the article American? Dan Koehl (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes, He's certainly not a Brit is he? 2600:8805:5800:F500:E90D:9570:BE1F:C25B (talk) 16:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

2018–19 California Baptist Lancers women's basketball team

Hi there. Through some talk page stalking I noticed you marked 2018–19 California Baptist Lancers women's basketball team as patrolled. This creator of that article has created many other similar articles all of which are in need of major cleanup and nearly all of them also remain unsourced. While the topics are no doubt notable I wanted to give you a heads-up about the larger issues that remain around this editor's creations. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Barkeep49:, I marked it as unpatrolled again, someting I will do futurewise, with articles in need of major cleanup, Its always better that more users analyze, so thanks for your heads-up. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Globex Trading System

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your feedback on the article that I put out on Wikipedia, Globex Trading System. It looks like it's marked for deletion by somebody named Vellela who has really been a thorn in my side. Currently there is no article about the Globex Trading System out there and it deserves to have an article. There isn't much information out there that describes Globex but I did my best to abide by the rules. It looks like you're a more seasoned Wikipedia author so please feel free to make the improvements that are necessary, or tell me exactly what I need to do especially to get the article from not being deleted. Vellela has been honing in on my articles and rather than take the time to help here, he/she is being a nazi about it. A power trip I guess.

Thanks, c62eu19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by C62eu19 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Arjun Patiala

Hello, can you please explain what content I removed? I just corrected the article. The film was supposed to release on 13 September 2018 but has been shifted to 2019. You can check the references if you want to. Thank you :) CorrectHai (talk) 11:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry @CorrectHai:, I notice that you in fact did not remove relevant text. Thank you. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Heinrich Dymsha

Could you explain why my edits to Heinrich Dymsha were "not constructive"? All I did was make the bits of information into complete sentences. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rerumscriptor48 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

You have also removed references Dan Koehl (talk) 21:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Unconstructive??

I edited an article to fix a grammatical error. You reverted it, sending me a message that it was an "unconstructive" edit. Same here in San Jose costa rica I respelled football because its actually spelled like this "fútbol" I looked it up.

I fixed the grammatical error again. You reverted it again and now accuse me of vandalism. What is the problem here?

Who can I escalate this issue to? You are clearly not the person who needs to be addressing this non-issue, which you can't seem to let go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.41.96.48 (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@Dan Koehl: the IP's edit came up in my feed so I took a look and the edits were indeed not vandalism. I have restored the edit accordingly. Just wanted to give you a heads up! cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:24, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Cymru.lass:, Im sorry @136.41.96.48:. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@Dan Koehl: No worries! Happens to the best of us Happy editing! cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

San jose costa rica

Fútbol not football (sports section) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.92.217.194 (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Tidal power stations

Hi, Koehl, I was attempting to edit an unconstructive edit, but it appears as though I added it. I apologize for the inconvenience. Thanks. MelWine talk 22:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for polite communication. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Barry Lyndon

Hello, Dan Koehl. You have new messages at 151.20.13.245's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WPCleaner 2.0

Installer for WPCleaner

Hello Dan Koehl.

I would like to inform you that a new version of WPCleaner is available replacing the old version (v1.43) dating back to almost a year. Unfortunately, going from version 1.43 to 2.0 automatically isn't possible and will require a new installation. It's necessary to install version 2.0 to take advantage of updates and bug fixes. Version 1.43 will have to be uninstalled manually, as there are no more updates for it.

The installation procedure is described at Wikipedia:WPCleaner/Installation.

Note: for usage in Bot mode, I strongly advise to check the modifications to be sure that the tasks run correctly

--NicoV ^{(Talk on frwiki)} 14:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the information @NicoV:, I will change version. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Done

Thanks for making me notice that error. Seems that another user wrongly posted it in the talk page so I fixed it. Thanks again! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you @Gerda Arendt:, that is kind of you! Dan Koehl (talk) 08:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Three years today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #023, 25 Nov 2018

There are now 4,180 portals.

Will we break 5,000 by the end of the year?

I know we can. But, that is up to you!

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Happy Holidays

Hello everyone! Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice (if it's occurring in your area of the world), and thanks for your work in maintaining, improving, and expanding portals. Cheers,    — The Transhumanist   06:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Elephant Nature Park

Hi Dan,

There is currently no criticism or concerns section in the Elephant Nature Park article. Did you and Jytdog not have any success finding links to balancing information?

Even if they are doing excellent work, perhaps there should be some mention of the Elephant Aid International Report from 2006.

It would be interesting to understand the Elephant Nature Park in the context of the elephant situation in Thailand generally and Thai elephant sanctuaries specifically, but I am certainly not an expert, and I haven't researched where to find citable information.

Thanks for your work,

Phersh (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying @Phersh:, the article is definitely POV again. My hands are somewhat tied in this situation, even if Admins have no problem at all that Leks exhusband is editing the article and removing sourced content with the comment "I removed some lies" Dan Koehl (talk) 08:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Dan Koehl,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13

Newsletter • December 2018

This month: A general update.

The current status of the project is as follows:

• Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
• I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
  • Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
  • If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
• Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.

Until next time,

-— Isarra ༆ 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Please give protection to the Mangalore article from frequent vandalisms

I would like to bring to your notice that you had protected the Mangalore article from vandalism during Sept-Oct 2018.
Even now, there are frequent insertions of Tulu administrative language and Tulunadu regions into the Mangalore article. This was the same reason, as to why it was earlier protected (Sept-Oct 2018).
I request you to give protection to the Mangalore article again ASAP.
2401:4900:3693:4BC0:50D0:2C58:F69E:AC94 (talk) 09:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Dan Koehl, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas !

Merry Christmas Dan !

I've been less active here during the summer and autumn, and have had real life trouble etc. I truly wish you a very Merry Christmas (it's not over yet) and a Happy New Year! Nice to hear from you! Boeing720 (talk) 09:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.6

Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supporters At 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running! You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019! Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! Hello Dan Koehl, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.3 -2018

Newsletter Nr 3, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Zoo Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2019 The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want! Participation: This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl. Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! Hello Dan Koehl, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #024, 26 Dec 2018

Last issue, I mentioned there would be a flood, and so, here it is...

Portals status

We now have 4,620 portals.

And the race to pass 5,000 by year's end is on...

Can we make it?

The New Year, and the 5,001st portal, await.

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Evad is back!

After disappearing in mid-thread, Evad37 has returned from a longer than expected wikibreak.

Be sure to welcome him back.

Improved cropping is coming to Portal image banner

User:FR30799386 is working on making {{Portal image banner}} even better by enabling it to chop the top off an image as well as the bottom.

Many pictures aren't suitable for banners because they are too tall. Therefor, User:FR30799386 added cropping to this template, so that an editor could specify part of a picture to be used rather than the whole thing.

Upgrade of flagship portals is underway

Work has begun on upgrading Wikipedia's flagship portals (those listed at the top of the Main page).

So far, Portal:Geography, Portal:History, and Portal:Technology have been revamped. Of course, you are welcome to improve them further.

Work continues on the other five. Feel free to join in on the fun.

Spotting missing portals that are redirects

In place of many missing portals, there is a redirect that leads to "the next best topic", such as a parent topic.

Most of these were created before we had the tools to easily create portals (they used to take 6 hours or more to create, because it was all done manually). Rather than leave a portal link red, some editors thought it was best that those titles led somewhere.

The subjects that have sufficient coverage should have their own portals rather than a redirect to some other subject.

Unfortunately, being blue like all other live links, redirects are harder to spot than redlinks.

To spot redirects easily, you can make them all appear green.

Keep 'em coming!

And I'll see you next issue.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   08:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #025, 30 Dec 2018

We can now crop the tops of pics to make banners

Before, we could only cut off the bottom of pics.

User:FR30799386 has pulled it off, and made the upgrade to {{Portal image banner}}...

So, this:

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Becomes this:

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Here's the code for the above banner:

{{Portal image banner|File:American Falls from Canadian side in winter.jpg | [[Niagara falls]], from the Canadian side |maxheight=175px |overflow=Hidden|croptop=10}}

To see it employed in a portal, check out Portal:Niagara Falls.

About that end of the year goal...

We were racing against time to create 5,000 portals by the end of the year (just for the heck of it).

We made it. We've passed the 5,000 portals mark, with time to spare!

And the 5,000th portal is Portal:Major League Baseball, by Happypillsjr.

Congratulations!

What's next?

The 10,000th portal mark. But...

...there is plenty else to do in addition to building new portals:

1. The new portals need to be linked to from the encyclopedia.
2. On those portals about subjects that are not typically capitalized, the search parameters need to be refined/expanded, to maximize the chances of Did you know and In the news items being found and displayed.
3. A Recognized content section needs to be added to each portal that has a corresponding WikiProject.
4. Addition of a category on those portals that lack a subject category.
5. Implement the portal category system, adding the appropriate categories to each portal.
6. Upgrade, and complete (as per the tasks enumerated above), the old-style portals that are not regularly maintained, which have not been converted yet (about 1,100 of them).
7. Find and fix the remaining bugs in the underlying lua modules.
8. Build portal tools (scripts) to assist in the creation, development, and maintenance of portals.
9. Build a script to help build navbox footer templates, via the harvesting of categories, amongst other methods.
10. Update the portal building instructions.
11. Update the portal guideline.
12. Refine the programming of the portals to reduce their load time.
13. Design and develop the next generation of portals and portal components.

And whatever else you can dream up.

But most of all, have a...

Happy New Year!

Dan Koehl, thank you for your contributions to the Portals Project, and have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   11:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Best wishes for a happy 2019

^{The Hill Country (c.1913) by Walter Elmer Schofield, Woodmere Art Museum.}
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)