Jump to content

User talk:Dan Eisenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Antisemitism in 21st-century France, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dan Eisenberg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eddie Edwards (politician) (September 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dan Eisenberg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern is troubling--you are consistently removing large amounts of what some would consider unflattering information from the pages of Democratic politicians (who all happen to be involved in highly competitive races) (here and here, for example), and adding large amounts of what some would consider unflattering information to the pages of Republican politicians (who all also happen to be involved in highly competitive races) (here, for example). You can't, in good faith, cry "WP:BLP" whenever something that could be perceived as negative is added to a Democratic page while making edits like this. I get it--there's an election in a month, and people get excited. But we need to maintain neutrality at all times and never engage in advocacy. This isn't the place to grind a partisan axe. If you continue to edit as you've been doing, by basically whitewashing Democratic pages and blackwashing Republican pages, I think a discussion about your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents would be warranted. I think you can make valuable additions here so I hope it doesn't come to that. Marquardtika (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marquardtika: Thanks for your polite, carefully worded, thoughtful and diplomatic post. I'll take a step back from editing these pages for now and should I return to editing of these page will be sure to carefully think through more first.-Dan Eisenberg (talk) 04:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Heitkamp

[edit]

Please, check sources before deleting sections in their entirety. Source cited lists the information presented.[1] SeminarianJohn (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dan Eisenberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dan Eisenberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dan Eisenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eddie Edwards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 07:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Heidi Heitkamp's Ratings and Endorsements". votesmart.org. Project Vote Smart. Retrieved October 13, 2018.