User talk:DanQuigley

Space Opera

Hi, I noticed your (cited!) addition to Space Opera. It messed up the grammar slightly (McAuley still reffered to "himself"), so i wanted to recast it slightly. But i don't have the reference, so can you tell me if the 3 newly added authors are mentioned in the Levy article? If so i'll split the sentence up to McAuley named xxx^(c) and yyy^(c), while Levy included zzz^(c) and aaa.^(c)

Using the citation for each author dissuades drive by additions of peoples favourite authors, which would otherwise look like they came from the already-present cite. Let me know, and i'll make the changes.Yobmod (talk) 09:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Requesting Your Help

Hello. I'm afraid it isn't possible to merge accounts (I have some edits under another user name myself.) The best remedy would be to redirect the user page of the other account to this one. In that case if anyone follows that user name from the page history, they will automatically end up your real user page. Regards, —Ruud 22:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Simonson

Just wanted to take the time to drop you a quick note to point out your typo to you so you realize the mistake and hopefully don't repeat it again in the future. Drop me a line on my talk page if you have any questions, otherwise have a good day. Spidey104 15:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Harris (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daredevil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruno Apitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nackt unter Wölfen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your recent edit to Mackinac Island appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flora Warren Seymour (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flora Warren Seymour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flora Warren Seymour, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 09:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DanQuigley! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 09:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Flora Warren Seymour

Hello, DanQuigley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flora Warren Seymour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Problem with Wikipedia

I disagree with the deletion of my Wikipedia article on Flora Warren Seymour. That disagreement has left a sour taste and has largely stopped me from wanting to participate further in anything to do with Wikipedia.DanQuigley 15:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Star Wars books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archie Goodwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Flora Warren Seymour (1888-1948).jpg

The file File:Flora Warren Seymour (1888-1948).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flora Warren Seymour has been accepted

Flora Warren Seymour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TJMSmith (talk) 22:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Steeger interview

Hi -- I saw you cited a Nils Hardin interview with Harry Steeger in Windy City Pulp Stories #11. Can you tell me if that's a reprint of the 1977 Xenophile fanzine interview Hardin did with Steeger? If so that would be very useful; I've been citing the original fanzine but a book publication would be preferable to make it clearer that it's a reliable source. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Mike. The article you cite is the original source. I only have access to the reprint of it that appears in Pulp Stories #11, ISBN 9781884449093. It's an absolutely fascinating article. More info from it ought to be in Steeger's Wikipedia page. I just didn't take the time. Probably botched my citation up something fierce too. Thanks for asking! DanQuigley 00:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it has a ton of information! I've cited it a few times, but it's good to know it's in Pulp Stories; that makes it a bit easier to convince folks this is a reliable source. I'm working on Argosy (magazine) and the moment but I don't think there's much in it about that. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]