User talk:DanPinGF

August 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nelvana, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. That is an improper use of G12. You only had concern about one portion of the article. G12 only applies if the entire article is copied and pasted. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Microsoft, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —DoRD (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DanPinGF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was a total mistake; actually this was on purpose. I thought I was making constructive edits to Wikipedia, but instead I was misbehaving. Vandalizing and all of that, I sometimes have bad memory. Sorry for the inappropriate edits. DanPinGF (talk) 00:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, good thing we blocked you, then. Competence is required. Yamla (talk) 01:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could somebody please respond to my unblock request? DanPinGF (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]