User talk:DanBlanchard

Welcome!

Hello, DanBlanchard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod 19:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Confidence in reason

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Confidence in reason, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.criticalthinking.org/articles/valuable-intellectual-traits.cfm. As a copyright violation, Confidence in reason appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Confidence in reason has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Confidence in reason and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Confidence in reason with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Confidence in reason.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. The same goes for the other articles copied from this website. NawlinWiki 00:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my user page regarding copyrighted content from the Foundation for Critical Thinking. Continue chat on this topic in Talk:Confidence_in_reason DanBlanchard 16:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Regarding Copyrights, I will be entering , at the request of my bosses, (the copyright holders) several articles from their glossary (that appear in print and in our website [http:www.criticalthinking.org Foundation for Critical Thinking]) regarding definitions of terms used in Critical Thinking, Such as Socratic questioning. The Foundation is a non-profit that produces research, training and educational texts. Dr.'s Paul and Elder are considered authorities on this subject and they have tasked me with inserting definitions into wiki for many of these terms. How do I properly note that this content is provided with full permission so that it doesn't get speedily deleted for violation... How do I undelete a speedy deletion DanBlanchard 17:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mere permission isn't good enough on Wikipedia; there have to be rights for redistribution, creation of distribution of derivative works, and a few others. See WP:GFDL for the full legal details (or GFDL for a description). If the copyright holders are willing to release the article under the GFDL, they should say so in an email to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org (and you can then mention that on the article's talk page when you recreate it (or you can request undeletion at WP:DRV)). Hope that helps! --ais523 17:07, 29 March 2007 (U T C)

Per Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, I need to wait until someone from Wikimedia confirms receipt of the permission email:

<<Afterwards, somebody with access to OTRS will come along and tag the article or image with {{PermissionOTRS|ticket=http://linktoticket.org}} providing evidence of the received email and clearing the status of the item in question. Please note that providing the link to the ticket number is essential to easy verification.>>

Once that happens, let me know and I will undelete the articles in question. Thanks, NawlinWiki 19:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Critical thinking

Dan: Thanks for your note on my talk page. I think that the article would benefit considerably from the vantage point of the Foundation. However, some of the changes you added were written in a style that was more bureaucratic than the wording replaced. Note that the lead is usually worded in language that is highly accessable to the general reader. I recognize that you have good information to add to the article. I like the idea of a collaboration: You and your colleagues have the subject-matter expertise, I can edit for readability. Sunray 06:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:FCTletterhead.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FCTletterhead.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Foundation for Critical Thinking for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foundation for Critical Thinking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for Critical Thinking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]