User talk:Dan653/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Accusations of vandalism and disruptive editing

Please immediately withdraw your false accusations of vandalism and disruptive editing and take the time to understand that I am fixing mistakes.86.128.2.106 (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

STOP SENDING ME STUPID MESSAGES. I AM FIXING A MISTAKE IN THE ARTICLE. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 86.128.2.106 (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by124.171.115.172 (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samsung_Electronics&diff=574233013&oldid=574232971

But, According to Neutral point of view, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view

"information contained in them fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias."

Then, if that edit is allow at here, then, iphone explode, htc one x explode are also can issue ? there are Tons of news article about that. I think edit is unfair and bias. and feel like slander. Thanks. --02fagE67 (talk) 20:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

And I explained content removal. I think my explaned it by good faith. Thanks. --02fagE67 (talk) 20:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

@02fagE67: Hi, thanks for asking on my talk page. Well, the exploding phone incidents was reported extensively in the news and deserves to be added in the article. If you think that violated the WP:NPOV, you can word the section better rather than removing it fully since it was properly sourced. Dan653 (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. But There are 3 questions. First, The investgation is not CONFIMRED explode battery was genuine battery with normal use. so, i think problem here. article has controversial edit by unconfirmed fact. Second, I think that article should go to each product page, not corporate page. what do you think? Third, Is it OK to add every single faulty product news at other companies ? (if faulty product incidents was reported extensively in the news. eg. iphone, HTC explode.) I think this is not fair and reasonable. Thanks. By the way, i go to sleep. i will see your message next day. Thanks and Bye --02fagE67 (talk) 21:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

but what happens if it was true and they thought it wasnt true? — Precedingunsigned comment added by 12.94.146.6 (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Dan the Americano

The majority of the World speaks a different variety of ENGLISH than you. Please respect that, STOP reverting edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.140.234 (talk) 23:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Spina Bifidia

You forgot to mention that people with a Spina Bifida have a tail. Just saying — Precedingunsigned comment added by 192.171.222.83 (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

viola

There was nothing that wasn't constructive about my addition to the page. I added key pop performances that featured the viola heavily. You are being peculiarly and needlessly de-constructive. Whatever, I'm glad I've got better things to do. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 81.152.81.108 (talk) 18:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, you are right, accidental revert on my part. Dan653 (talk) 19:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

ignorance

Please explain how adding an important birth to Wikipedia is vandalism? I'd love to see how you spin this. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Fat Jamie (talk • contribs) 01:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay, let's cut the bullshit. "Fat Jamie" is not notable. Even if it was notable it would need a citation per WP:CITE. Finally, its justnonsense. Dan653 (talk) 01:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Fat Jamie is notable. Just because you haven't heard of Fat Jamie doesn't mean Fat Jamie isn't notable. It's actually a reflection of your ignorance. Get off your power trip, you imbecilic buffoon. You're displaying your envy of Fat Jamie and proving me right. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Fat Jamie (talk • contribs) 01:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

If you find that "fat jamie" has signifigant media coverage, reliable sources talk about it, it has no original research, and is idependent of the subject, which it is not since you are the subject, per wp:SPIP. Dan653 (talk) 11:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dan Sorry for being an arse that squirts in the right direction but I am not vandalising :)

Hi Dan Sorry for being an arse that squirts in the right direction but I am not vandalising :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.115.172 (talk) 02:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Clear vandalism. The fact you don't admit it clearly indicates you're only here to be a nuisance. Timeshift (talk) 03:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism?

I'm confused how exactly did I VANDILIZE? Cause I didn't. If I was going to vandilize I would be way more creative and subtle about it. If you undo my last few edits I will reveal to you all of the articles that I have subtely vandilized over the past few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.190.6 (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3

Hey Dan653! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according tohttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it atWP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must:

• Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug
• Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot

If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or #huggle ^connect. Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank youPetrb (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3 beta is out - and we need more feedback!

Hey Dan653, how are you? I am Petrb, one of huggle developers, and you are currently subscribed as a beta tester of huggle on meta (meta:Huggle/Members. You may not have noticed, but this week I released first beta precompiled installers for ubuntu and microsoft windows! Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta has all the links you need. So if you can, please download it, test it and report all bugs that is really what we need now. Don't forgot that as it's just a beta it's unstable and there are some known issues. Be carefull! Thank you for helping us with huggle Petrb (talk) 16:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15