User talk:Damir A

Re: Pacta Conventa

Oh, I'm so sorry for not responding earlier.

It makes sense to have a Pacta Conventa disambiguation article, but only if it's possible to write two decent articles about them :) The Croatian one is basically unknown so it'll be hard to compose a non-stub article about it.

--Joy [shallot] 10:57, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

YUBA Liga

The Yugoslav Wars was considered a political civil war, ethnic realities behind it were there but to call it an "ethnic strife" is partially innaccurate. It was the politics behind the ethnicity, not the ethnicity behind the politics. I won't change it however. --Hurricane Angel 09:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drazen Petrovic

see Talk:Dražen Petrović --Bender235 14:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Drazen Petrovic

Didn't even notice there was two pages, sorry about that. I reverted to your version. // Lowg ^.talk. 06:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting now how Wolff as a source is uncredible when he doesn't support the POV you are trying to portray? I thought the statement should have been removed from the beginning, glad to see you now agree when I present an alternate POV. // Lowg ^.talk. 14:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Weasel Words

"A tireless shooter and most prolific scorer, Petrović is arguably the most celebrated basketball player to ever emerge from the Old Continent. He is considered the crucial part of the vanguard to the present-day mass influx of European players into the NBA."

Weasel words are words or phrases that seemingly support statements without attributing opinions to verifiable sources. Weasel words give the force of authority to a statement without letting the reader decide if the source of the opinion is reliable. If a statement can't stand on its own without weasel words, it lacks neutral point of view; either a source for the statement should be found, or the statement should be removed. // Laughing Man 23:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bosniakophobia

It is interesting how Serbs promoted invented word "Serbophobia" on the internet. First they introduced the word to wikipedia, and then thousands of other scrapper sites copied content from wikipedia, and now Google yields thousands of matches for this invented word. Of course, while Bosniaks wanted to do the same, and create an article Bosniakophobia, Serbs quickly jumped and voted "NO!". And of course, attempts to create Bosniakophobia article failed thanks to Serbian activism on wikipedia! They don't use wikipedia for educational, but for their nationalistic/politic purposes. It is sickening to see Serbian propaganda and lies poisoning Wikipedia. Bosniak 07:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited

Please accept this invite to join the WikiProject National Basketball Association, a WikiProject dedicated to improving National Basketball Association related articles. Simply click here to accept!

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]