User talk:DaltoUprising

Leave me a message!

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Homok43

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Homok43, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Community portal; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please stop pretending to be an admin, vandalizing, and "blocking" people. This is your only warning - you will be blocked if this behavior continues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneralNotability (talk • contribs) 16:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTHERE/WP:CIR

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An explanation

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DaltoUprising (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a myriad of issues with my ban. First in foremost, I never vandalized any actual articles. I mainly posted on people's userspaces, which are not actual articles that people actually read. I agree I may have abused my editing privileges by posting block messages to their pages, but I had no idea that I could be blocked myself by doing that. The TRUTH is, is that I am being blackmailed. My roommate has been threatening to use his account to get on here and mess with the pages, if I don't make the edits he tells me to make so he can get "a good laugh". I stopped immediately after I was warned, but I guess that is irrelevant now. I was shocked to attempt to edit an article, only to find a block in place. Secondly, why was my bio erased? It wasn't disruptive at all. I would like for my account on here to be unbanned, or for my block to at least be shortened. I had a really bad night at work, and I've been in a foul mood all morning. I will make a commitment to cease all disruptive editing and dedicate my time to fighting vandalism. I have a shitload of wiki work lined up this week. I'm sorry for any inconveniences that came out of this account.

Decline reason:

Looking at your contributions, I don't see how Wikipedia has anything to gain by unblocking a user who felt the need to post obscenities on other users' talk pages "on a dare". Competence is required. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DaltoUprising (talk) 17:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First, can you explain why you posted a block notice at 17:27 on User talk:Homok43 after I had warned you at 17:25. Also why did you remove yourself from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (even doing so without explaining with an edit summary) (Special:Diff/963932193)? Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I deleted myself from the intervention page was so admins wouldn't see it and I could avoid a block.

Also do you control User:FishDoesMC or do you know the person who controls that account? It seems strange that you would make so those edits to their userpage without knowing them or controlling the account. Also, why did you make several distruptive edits to their userpage such as this one. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to do it, my friend made me do it. He was standing over my shoulder the entire time. I do not know these people, they were random people my friend and I saw in the Recent Changes

There are a myriad of reasons not to unblock you (1) you were warned multiple times by several users to stop posting bogus block messages and warnings to others pages (2) Per WP:BROTHER, we've heard the brother/sister/roommate/cousin story hundreds of times before, and it's actually a good reason for you to stay blocked (3) your user page was deleted because, among a number of other issues, you claimed to be an admin on it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]