User talk:Dals093838

Welcome!

Hello, Dals093838, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Heliamphora 'red mambo', may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Comatmebro (talk) 03:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heliamphora 'red mambo'

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Heliamphora 'red mambo' requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro (talk) 03:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Heliamphora 'red mambo') has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Heliamphora 'red mambo', Dals093838!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm not convinced that this cultivar stub really merits its own article. I suggest that if you are unlikely to expand it, the information is included in the Heliamphora page, and that this page simply becomes a redirect to it.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 01:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heliamphora. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 18:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove content from Wikipedia articles without explaining the reason for doing so, as you did with this edit to Heliamphora, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove content from Wikipedia and without an explanation in the edit summary, as you did with this edit to Heliamphora. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heliamphora

Stop saying im a vandal. Its ridiculous.

The picture and info are not accurate. The picture was my picture. So i have the right to remove it. Stop adding my picture without my permission or i will take legal issues.

Also, stop editing the heliamphora's page with bad information, or personnal opinion.

I will always removing the bad information.

dals09 Dals093838 (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dals093838 - Your legal threat above is in violation of Wikipedia's policy here. You need to respond here and formally retract your threat and state that you don't intent to take any legal action. If I don't hear from you and if you don't do so, I'm going to have to block your account indefinitely from editing. Please respond as soon as possible; I'm giving you a chance to put this problem to rest without any harm or foul, but I'm not going to wait around very long... Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Your recent editing history at Heliamphora shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits to Heliamphora, as well as for making legal threats on Wikipedia. These behaviors are not allowed, and violate Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:40 19 December 2018 (UTC)