User talk:Dalia Soliman CoE

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I called my article Draft:.... how do I rename it? Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 16:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is exactly where it is supposed to be. I have added an articles for creation template to the draft. When you think the draft is ready, click on the "submit your draft" button.

Prior to doing that, however, there are some things you need to do. Your username is in an acceptable form indicating that you are associated with the COE, but you failed to make a disclosure on your user page.

When looking at your draft, reviewers are going to want to see references that establish that the organization meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. This cannot be done by relying solely on documents produced by the organization, which, at first glance, is what your current set of references appear to be. You need to have independent reporting about the organization.

When writing a Wikipedia article, it is very important that the article not appear to express the goals and aspirations of an organization as if they were facts, in Wikipedia's voice, nor to make assertions about future actions. These can - to a limited extent - be conveyed by citing announcements of plans or from quotations. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I edited my User page already and wrote an email asking for verification. I'll work on the other points you mentioned now. I will add some other sources, even though there are not as many as the organization is fairly new. Thanks a lot for helping me with this.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dalia Soliman CoE. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

Can somebody tell me if my Article is ready to be published? I tried to verify my account but didnt receive any E-Mail yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalia Soliman CoE (talk • contribs) 13:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)--Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft does not have independent references that establish your subject's notability according to the criteria that apply to organizations. Your current references all seem to be too closely tied to the organization to be considered independent.

Thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest on your user page.

Please remember to sign your talk page posts. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again for helping me with this. I added all external sources that we currently have, which are also not all tied to us. Is there nything else what I can do to make it more likely the article will be published? I'm a litle confused because I made the article with view to an example of another article in the same field (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zentrum_f%C3%BCr_Internationale_Friedenseins%C3%A4tze) and they didn't use any sources but their website. How is that possible? I need the article to be published by wednesday, is there a way to speeden up this process? Thank you for answering again, much appreciated. --Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Each different language Wikipedia has its own standards and policies. I can't speak to why an article in German Wikipedia meets their criteria. On English Wikipedia, an organization must meet notability criteria and those criteria discount anything the organization says about itself. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didnt know the policies were that different. I reviewed the references once again and added anything there is.. --Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 09:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CoECC Signet RGB neg 180x180px.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CoECC Signet RGB neg 180x180px.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Is it enough how I pointed out my relation to the organisation and therefore the artice? I'm waiting for my article to be reviewed sice a while. Is there anything more I can do?

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it enough how I pointed out my relation to the organisation and therefore the artice? I'm waiting for my article to be reviewed since a while. Is there anything more I can do?

You need to resubmit your article, click the "resubmit" button in the box at the top of the draft. You have made the required conflict of interest and paid editing declarations. 331dot (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove the external links from the article body...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dalia Soliman CoE! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your review. I removed the external links as you told me. If this is still not enough, please let me know.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 08:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I updated it as you told me to, is it ok now? Thanks a lot!

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management has been accepted

European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]