User talk:Dalekusa
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Dalekusa's nomination. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Rodhullandemu 23:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Your Premature Deletion
[edit]I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. Deleting the Baltimore's Marching Ravens page for plagiarism? I'm the copy editor for the band, and that content is being used on several pages. I don't think I need your permission to do that, for two reasons: it's OUR content to do what we want with, and Wikipedia is NOT considered an academic source so why it needs all original content to be considered relevant is beyond me. I'm interested to hear your reasoning here. User:Jgaffney at 016:49, December 19, 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 21:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: THX
[edit]Thank you! Just doing my job. east.718 at 05:56, November 21, 2007
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed a couple of warnings you issued today, to 72.235.68.104 and 24.60.218.3, apparently for vandalism to Elmo today. You also reported 24..60.218.3 on AIV for vandalism to Elmo. Looking at the changelog for Elmo it doesn't seem that either of those anons (or indeed anyone else) has edited Elmo today and, in fact, the article has been semiprotected since 27th November anyway. I see you're using Twinkle. Is there a bug in it, leading to spurious warnings being placed? Tonywalton | Talk 14:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Gotcha. It's worth remembering though that these are shared IP addresses; the person using that IP address for vandalism two or three days ago may well not be the person using it today, or in six weeks time if no-one's using that address today. In the case of 24..60.218.3 they just got themselves blocked anyway, for this. Cheers Tonywalton | Talk 15:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Your Rfa
[edit]I just wanted to wish you good luck on your Rfa. Your probably won't succeed in it, but don't let that get your spirits down. My Rfa was rejected, however, I plan on running again sometime. Good luck!! Dustihowe (talk) 18:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent RfA
[edit]I'm sorry, but I've closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you've only got 142 edits on Wikipedia; while edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards that they judge RfA candidates by, there was no chance that the RfA was going to pass.
I'm sorry about this, and hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I'm confident that you could possibly run a successful RfA in the future. You may want to consider submitting yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review for feedback on where to get some good experience, and when you're ready for RfA again, there's a great Wikipedia:Admin coaching program for you to use, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.
If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Smile!
[edit]
Mark has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Resetti in Animal Crossing: City Folk
[edit]See the discussion about the manual differences. Can you respond there? Thanks, travisl (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Twinkle
[edit]Hello.
Could you provide some feedback at the Twinkle bug you reported, WP:TW/BUG#294?
Thank you, Amalthea 17:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Heterogeneous (chemistry)
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Heterogeneous (chemistry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 16:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
In regards to "Heterogenous (chemistry)"
[edit]I didn't create this article myself, though I was logged in to a school computer. Someone must have accidentially created the article not knowing my account was logged in. Sincere apoligies from Dalekusa (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- As i always say: No damage done, no damage intended, no apology needed :) Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 13:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
RFC posting script issues
[edit]Use this tool instead. @harej 23:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Input please
[edit]Would like your input here please. Note: This is a draft, to be kept in my namespace until the editor is off their block and their new contributions can be reviewed. Frmatt (talk) 07:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
I will obey the Dalek
[edit]Daleks are the supreme power, of the universe! I obey your command and have semi-protected [1] the Little Einsteins article. — Kralizec! (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- That's why my motto is EXTERMINATE ALL VANDALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dalekusa (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 845866baf80b54aaf33b17b7694100f2
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
I've restored this article you tagged since although the article was previously deleted through AfD on the grounds of notability, two high-quality references demonstrating notability have since been published, and were added to the article. I therefore advised the original article creator that re-creating the article would be perfectly fine. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
ACC Request Confirmation
[edit]I have requested an ACC account on the toolserver. Dalekusa (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in as well as the mailing list.
- Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day (a day being from 0:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC), although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.
- Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
CITV Help
[edit]{{helpme}}
The logo gallery on the CITV article is acting very strange. Can you help me with this? Dalekusa (talk) 19:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- All of the images except one in the gallery have been deleted, so that's why nothing was showing up in most of the boxes. Since the remaining image is already used in the article's infobox, I removed the entire section. Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao talk 19:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
What should I do?
[edit]{{helpme}}
I'm having problems with another user, IamaelandLuigi21, who keeps adding that Geo is Milli's cousin, and now simply her "friend", in the Team Umizoomi article. The official website says that Geo and Milli are siblings. I've reverted his edits twice in the past 24 hours, and after the second revert, I left a message on his talkpage.
1. If I revert again, does this count as a violation of the 3RR?
2. What further actions should I take?
- If you consider the edits vandalism, then reverting vandalism does not count towards the three-revert rule. In this case, because it doesn't look like we can be certain it's vandalism, reverting the same edit on the same page within a 24 hour period would be a violation of 3RR and would be considered edit warring. I suggest you warn the user with {{uw-3rr}} and continue to try to discuss the issue with IsmaelandLuigi21 like you have tried to do. If you see the user breaking 3RR by reverting your reversions, you can make a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao talk 17:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012
[edit] | ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter | ||
| This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed. | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013
[edit]
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Roll call!
[edit]
|
Sega Task Force Roll Call! | |
| Member of the Sega Task Force of WikiProject Video games, are you active and editing Sega articles? If so, please answer the roll call at WT:SEGA! Make sure to check out the Sega Task Force's pages and utilize its pages, including the community talk page, review department, and free image gallery, all of which can help you with your article writing! Happy editing! | ||
| Roll call initiated by Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... on 02:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
Dora the explorer
[edit]Why did you erase Dora canceling in 2015? --24.170.75.206 (talk) 15:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Because there is no evidence. If you have an article or document that is publicly available, you may add that information back and add a source reference. Wikipedia is not for speculation or assumptions, but for verifiable facts. Dalekusa (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Watch this video to see if that's true when Dora is canceled. [1] --24.170.75.206 (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but a reaction video is not a reliable source. If you can find an actual news article or press release, then the edit can stand. Otherwise, it is original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Dalekusa (talk) 20:49, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Dora the Explorer is renewed? --24.170.75.206 (talk) 02:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Dalekusa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dalekusa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
- ^ my reaction to dora the explorer getting cancelled in 2015 from YouTube, June 22, 2014.