User talk:Dalejenkins

Greetings from a sockpuppet

I saw your post at:

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Plea from a former sockpuppeteer

I don't know you or just what you've gotten up to; I've only seen a bit of the edges of this over the last few weeks. You say you want to shift to a new track. I'm a sockpuppet; I was en:blocked for eight months. So, I'm proof that one can return.

You were pointed at Wikipedia:Standard offer and that's just an essay. It's a good one but one thing it needs to push more is work on other projects. As I see it, just biding one's time for six months and asking nicely is not sufficient.

I recommend the work on non-en:wp route. I see your account is not SUL-unified. You need to do this, and it will entail requesting a brief unblock to perform the unification (it will not allow any editing and would be for on the order of ten supervised minutes). This seems to be your main account and by unifying it and then using it elsewhere in a productive manner, you can work on the trust issues.

You should do a few things; list your accounts and the IPs you've used. Be honest. Was that you I reversed on DF's page, today? Do I know you as some other account or sock farm? You've done good work? Give examples. You should know that other eyes will be on this page, both because of your history, and mine.

I'm not offering anything, at this point. You'll have to convince me that I should bother and that I should trust you. If you make a reasonable response here, I'll look further into your history and may offer to point you at the road back.

—Sincerely, Street-Legal Sockpuppet Jack Merridew 04:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BB10UKPress.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:BB10UKPress.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HOPKINS.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HOPKINS.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RachelRice.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RachelRice.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalejenkins for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SuperSonic SPEED (formerly known as ChaosControl1994). 21:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother 2009 (UK) GA nomination

I've noticed that you are one of the top contributors to Big Brother 2009 (UK). I am sending this message to inform you that the article is now nominated for Good Article status. KingOfTheMedia (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BigBrotherUKFAQ

Template:BigBrotherUKFAQ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sun front.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sun front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:24, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DailyStar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DailyStar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. Thank you. Lilac Storm (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YTvideopage.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YTvideopage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TheApprenticeYoureFired.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TheApprenticeYoureFired.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 03:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Dalejenkins/Apprentice3epsg

User:Dalejenkins/Apprentice3epsg, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dalejenkins/Apprentice3epsg and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dalejenkins/Apprentice3epsg during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 21:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files nominated for deletion

See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 July 22 and Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dermotoleary.jpg. Peter E. James (talk) 19:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Controversy and criticism of The X Factor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Controversy and criticism of The X Factor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversy and criticism of The X Factor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 05:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Inviteapprentice2

Template:Inviteapprentice2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Celebrity Big Brother

Template:Celebrity Big Brother has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fired apprentice.png

The file File:Fired apprentice.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fired article talk.PNG

The file File:Fired article talk.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BBRaceRow.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BBRaceRow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comic Relief Does The Apprentice

The article Comic Relief Does The Apprentice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little notability for a separate article on this information, considerable amount of original research, with information various elements (i.e. participates) more suited for being included on main articles for The Apprentice and Comic Relief

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GUtt01 (talk) 23:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CRDTA07.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CRDTA07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject The Apprentice UK

Template:WikiProject The Apprentice UK has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heat-Magazine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heat-Magazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Dumped

Dumped has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:15MINUTES" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:15MINUTES has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2 § Wikipedia:15MINUTES until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]