User talk:Dale101usa

Welcome!

Hello, Dale101usa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 05:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Chris-Evert+her-lethal-weapon-97-800.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris-Evert+her-lethal-weapon-97-800.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image copyright problem with Image:Mary-Pierce-black-dress+stocks-74H-610.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mary-Pierce-black-dress+stocks-74H-610.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 13:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 03:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mimi Rogers

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mimi Rogers, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 14:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a peculiar comment, because Acccording To The Wikipedia Mimi was in the March 1993 issue of "Playboy" in the USA. Do see "People who were in 'Playboy' in the 1990s. Further, Mimi Rogers herself was on "The Tonight Show" this week, and she and Jay Leno openly discussed her nude appearance in Playboy "13 years ago". Now, 2006 minus 13 equals 1993, Lo and Behold. Dale A. Wood, MS in engineering and MA in mathematics.

Mariah Carey

Please note that Wikipedia:Fair use criteria states free-licensed images must always be used if located, and that they should never be replaced by non-free ones. Also, the description pages for all non-free images must have a valid explanation of why the use of the image on Wikipedia consistutes fair use; see Help:Image page#Fair use rationale and Wikipedia:Fair use. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 00:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Up yours, you ingrate. And I did explain this is a free-use image distributed by ABC-TV. Like it or lump it. Some people need to learn to mind their own business: you do not OWN the Wikipedia or its article on Mariah Caryy,

Please STOP harming ACURATE AND FACTUAL ARTICLE: SUPERMODEL

PLEASE do not edit what I've confirmed. These girls are supermodels. I am a supermodel expert. I have dozens of magazines. Even go to thefashionspot.com, and EVERYONE THERE ARE HARCORE FANS OF SUEPRMODELS, AND KNOW WHO AND WHO ISN'T A SUPERMODEL. Lil Flip246 22:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

You have removed and re-edited OFFICIAL FACTS, and changed it around. i.e. You put Niki Taylor and Yamilia as coming out in the late 90s, when the truth is they came out in the early 90s! Please do not remove information and re-edit stuff of which you have no knowledge of. Lil Flip246 22:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dale101usa"

You're crazy! As is stated elsewhere in the Wikipedia (Hah!) a Supermodel should be well-known individuals.

Putting little-known characters under the "Supermodel" character is crazy. The Key is to be well-known, not just to be known by some sort of cognostici (SP?) "in-the-know" individuals. By the way, Ms. Diaz-Rahi's first name only has one "i" in it - if you knew anything about Spanish and how things are spelled and pronounced. Furthermore, Yamila Diaz-Rahi was an UNKNOWN until she started appearing in "Sports Illustrated" in the Late 1990's, and the same applies to Nikki Taylor. Just because some 14-15-year-old does some modeling does not make her a Supermodel. This is a job that required some Maturity and Worldwide exposure....

A "supermodel expert"????? You've flushed your brain down the commode! The whole point is that to know who is a supermodel, you don't have to be any expert, just like to know who is the President of the USA or France, or the Queen of England, you do not need to be a Political Scientist... Dale A Wood, a man with Common Sense, who has kept his brains out out the commode!

List of Astronauts

Thanks for adding details to the List of astronauts by name. However, inserting personal opinions like "So What?" after an entry is not particularly helpful. If you feel the content is not worthy of a Wikipedia article, then be bold and edit or remove it and provide an explanation in the edit summary or on the talk page. Regards Rillian 20:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==I think that indicating someone as "The first Jewish astronaut" or the "first Black Russian female cosmonaut" is irrelevant and rather dimwitted, and a big "So What". This fades into Deep, Deep Insignificance compared to "He/She was killed on thus and such spaceflight". Please put your brains into perspective about what is important and what is not important!

Cheryl Tweedy

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Driller thriller 12:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing irrelevant NONSENSE is not vandalism - and so, you need to do some serious work on you vocabulary, and probably an overhaul to your brains, too.

Image copyright problem with Image:Heather-Kozar-portrait-28H-625.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heather-Kozar-portrait-28H-625.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Julie-London-66-675.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Julie-London-66-675.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Modelling/modeling

The word is spelled "modelling" in English and "modeling" in American English, so both are acceptable for use in Wikipedia, as this is the English Language Wikipedia, not the American English Wikipedia. You should refrain from editing articles purely to force a particular variant, but I'll leave your edit as is for the Estella Warren article, as it is about a US person. Robwingfield ^(talk) 11:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Day of the Year articles

Regarding this edit: long-standing practice is that if someone has a Wikipedia article, they're automatically entitled to listings under 'Births and 'Deaths' on these pages. Please do not delete valid entries. --CalendarWatcher 13:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do NOT add editorial comments to entries, such as 'contraversial'. --CalendarWatcher 13:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Jasper (Vision Quest) Article Scheduled For Deletion

Hi there, You have shown through your contributions that you're a fan of the 1980s movie "Vision Quest". I created an article on actor Frank Jasper who played the villian, Brian Shute, in the movie. I've also included information about what Dr. Jasper is doing now. Many people have wondered through Wikipedia and Imdb whatever happened to him, and I've tried to put this information out there for everyone. Unfortunately, some people think the article should be deleted for whatever reason. If you loved the movie as much as I did, please go to this link and voice your support before the article is deleted. Thanks a lot. I would appreciate your support very much.

Mister Jinxy 20:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cori-Nadine-MuscleMag-cover-142-720.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cori-Nadine-MuscleMag-cover-142-720.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Fair use and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelvinc 09:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Conchita-Martinez-of-Spain-36-480.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Conchita-Martinez-of-Spain-36-480.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It/they

Something I noticed on the Jaime Pressly edits, and thought worth mentioning. In British English, organisations are quite often treated as plural, so "The magazine listed her as *their* person of the week" would generally be considered correct. (Brits also treat sports teams as plural, so "Manchester United won *their* first game of the season.") Of course since JP is American, US English is correct for that particular article, so you were right to make the change - but it's not wrong in all varieties of English. 81.159.57.9 02:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chris-Evert-Wheaties-box-32-360.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris-Evert-Wheaties-box-32-360.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Veronica-Varekova-bikini-SI04-cover-164-900.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Veronica-Varekova-bikini-SI04-cover-164-900.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 03:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Toni-Tennille-&-the-Captain-56sq-555.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Toni-Tennille-&-the-Captain-56sq-555.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The-Righteous-Brothers-45sq-500.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The-Righteous-Brothers-45sq-500.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Essential-Skeeter-Davis-28sq-300.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Essential-Skeeter-Davis-28sq-300.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Agnetha-Faltskog-dark-dress+boots-65-500.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Agnetha-Faltskog-dark-dress+boots-65-500.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Agnetha-Faltskog-dark-dress+boots-65-500.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Agnetha-Faltskog-dark-dress+boots-65-500.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Agnetha-Faltskog-dark-dress+boots-65-500.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Agnetha-Faltskog-dark-dress+boots-65-500.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trieste

I see you're active on the Trieste article. However, I have to notify you that the article uses predominantly British spelling and that per WP:ENGVAR editors should not change the spelling from British to American or vice versa without a good reason. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 19:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Even if people's comments are poorly worded or grammatically deficient, please do not edit them. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Common or alternate names for schools

I don't know why you have decided that common abbreviations, atlernate names or nicknames of universities and colleges are suddenly not worthy for inclusion on Wikipedia. Certainly, I don't know why you've decided to make this change only on the University of Miami article. However, if you continue to remove that information without consensus, which is referenced and entirely valid content for the lead of the article, you may be blocked for disruptive editing and/or edit warring.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

Hello, Dale101usa. You have a reply to your message at User_talk:Begoon's talk page.

Begoon ^talk 08:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Burnside, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frobenius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Kansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Demonym

The term demonym is a word used for people or the inhabitants of a place. Regardless of that, changing United States to American, as you did here, potentially introduces an ambiguity, since American refers to 2 continents, not a single country.

Since we've interacted before, and you emailed me personally, I'm also going to be a bit bold, and give you some advice, which you are free to ignore, of course. Your edit summaries when making corrections such as this can appear to some to be rather condescending and abrasive, especially when you give people instructions like: "do not go around making up words ad libtum!". and "it should not be used at all, since it gets out of date in an INSTANT. Get it?".

I hope you take this advice in the spirit it is intended. None of us here knows everything, and everyone contributes in good faith. I've always found you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Begoon ^talk 12:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Walter Bedell Smith may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

his own meager reserves, two airborne divisions. Whiteley and Betts visited the U.S. First Army]] headquarters and they were unimpressed with the way it was handling the situation.
{| width="100%"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 10, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Escambia County and Mobile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pioneer 10 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TRW

San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Billion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Russian Navy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Danish

Standoff Land Attack Missile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Air raid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]