User talk:Dalco26

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contribution because it didn't appear constructive. Check the several meanings of the term Macedonian and the article fringe science, as well as Macedonism and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. If you believe the info you have added was correct or/and unbiased, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contribution again because you did not discuss the change on the article's talk page before making it abain. Please check the added sources and the talk page and provide reliable sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history on Vlado Chernozemski shows that you tend currently to be engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Jingiby (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Dimitrioski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oliver Dimitrioski, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Oliver Dimitrioski

Hello, Dalco26,

Thank you for creating Oliver Dimitrioski.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Oliver Dimitrioski, but I and other editors have pointed out several problems. If these are not addressed, future editors may call for the article to be deleted. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goran Anastasovski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Goran Anastasovski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]