User talk:Dajuric

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Dajuric, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 03:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WebSocketRPC

Hello, Dajuric. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, WebSocketRPC, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 06:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about WebSocketRPC

Hello, Dajuric,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether WebSocketRPC should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebSocketRPC .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Rentier (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rentier,

what should I fix so the article is accepted ? The library is new and there the references are yet to be created. I have cited all pages I could, and you can see they are the relevant ones. I have no intention to put non-objective data.

I would be grateful if you could point me out what https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accord.NET has but WebSocketRPC article does not have (except the references, because the Accord.NET framework is released years ago) ?

Thank you.

Best, Darko

January 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to WebSocketRPC. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]