User talk:Daisy Fried

Hello, Daisy Fried, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

hope you don't mind my adding silly third party references to your page. it's part of the ~~silly~~ pedantic gane of proving you're notable. Pohick2 (talk) 02:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Fried article

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Daisy Fried, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Dy yol (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever initiated the article about me wrote a piece that seemed mildly hostile in intent--not at all neutral; was riddled with inaccuracies (some of them embarrassing in addition to being false); and included a single hostile review. I corrected factual inaccuracies, and added up-to-date information, and accurate quotes from three reviews from reputable sources cited at the end of the quotes. Please feel free to remove them, but in that case, leave off the single hostile review from the previous review section, which, because it stood alone, seemed intended to attack. One inaccuracy I couldn't fix is that my name isn't Margaret Daisy Fried. Perhaps you could handle that. Daisy Fried (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)Daisy Fried[reply]

i was afraid that was going to happen, i for one found your edits just fine, but the rules at wikipedia make your edits suspect (ain't that a kick in the head). i'm sorry you thought that was hostile, i only included that review because it was the only web accessible third party opinion that i could find (Cold Front Magazine). (sometimes reviews are important to establish notability of other poets who have fewer awards than you). the inaccurate flotsam and jetsam of the web are at least a start on a biography of living poets. and it provides an easy platform to show the links to your work at ploughshares and poetry. Pohick2 (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the "margaret" came from the whyy bio, here [1] Pohick2 (talk) 18:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

okay, no problem. add back in the coldfront review for sure. I didn't mean to sound like I want to whitewash things. My real name is Margaret F G Fried, my nickname is Daisy but it's not Margaret Daisy. I probably asked hyy to change that years ago; I guess they never did. I know there's a lot of weird if not bad info floating around the web. I was mostly embarrassed because it sounded like I was married to the right-wing talk show host Jim Quinn (horror) whereas I'm married to the way-left-wing writer Jim Quinn. Anyway, thanks! Sorry to sound cross. Daisy Fried (talk) 18:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)Daisy[reply]

not at all, that review tends to show the reviewer not the subject, (sometimes wikipedia devolves into legalistic rules to guard against the adolescent spamming) but you present the O. Henry, Jimmy Carter problem, (the librarians will always want to put your full name) now if we could find enough writings to make Jim Quinn (way-left-wing writer) notable. hmm [2], [3], [4] Pohick2 (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]