User talk:Daifawei/Bianyifang

Peer review

Hi, Daifawei. I have reviewed your article and I believe you did a great job. The information in this article has become more complete and useful after your rewriting. Overall, the content you added is well-organized and easy to read. However, I think it would be great if you could add some images to help readers to better understand the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssylviaiii (talk • contribs)

Hi David, I like the way you organized the article and the detailed information you provided. Good job!!

Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daifawei/Bianyifang/Ririying_Peer_Review --Ririying (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on your article

@Daifawei: Greetings! You've certainly added a lot of content to the article. Unfortunately, there are many examples of plagiarized text throughout this article:

Reliable and affordable duck that won’t blow away experienced duck-eaters but suitable for a low-key introduction, Bianyifang will likely still be churning out ducks 600 years hence for the hungry masses.
No catalogue of Beijing restaurants would be complete without Peking duck. Bianyifang is the oldest surviving restaurant... is taken from this page.

This is a huge problem that the WikiEd material went over in detail related to Wikipedia's policies on copyright violations. There appear to many examples of text is both not appropriate tone and is copy and pasted with quotation marks.

I had a few pieces of other feedback that is less important:

I don't understand what this means: Due to the reason that fire is not seen in the process of cooking the roast duck, people thus call it “green duck”. Also, you should add a reference for claims like this!
I noticed that your edits have removed a number of wiki links to other pages in Wikipedia. You should make sure you have those when you use terms that a general reader won't understand.
In some places you say that this is the oldest duck house and in others you say it is one of the oldest. Be consistent!
In general, you should try to focus on on WP:TONE.
A detailed description of the process of cooking Peking duck is probably not really appropriate for an article on a restaurant.

Given the issues with copied text all over this article, I would blank this page and start over. You probably should talk with altsalt about this.

You absolutely should not copy this over. —mako ๛ 04:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]