User talk:DaddySaurus

October 2020

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Bachelorette (season 12)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chad Johnson (television personality). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DaddySaurus, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DaddySaurus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chad Johnson (television personality). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wes sideman (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Wes. It sounds like you’re attempting to have a lawsuit against yourself for spreading false information. Your account info can be found via an audit through an attorney requesting your information via the court system. DaddySaurus (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DaddySaurus. I'm unsure of which way to respond to this - I have two choices - so I will do a little of both. First:

Please read Wikipedia:No legal threats. I could probably get you blocked right now, but on the off chance that you're unaware of that policy, and because I just read Wikipedia:Don't overlook legal threats, I'm going to hold off.

Second:

Your threat of "Your account info can be found via an audit through an attorney requesting your information via the court system" is really funny. Every piece of info added to the article is sourced from reliable sources. If you can get those newspapers and websites to retract the information about your domestic violence abuses, via an attorney, you should do that. At that point, the information would be removed from your article. In addition, that would be a lot easier than getting Wikipedia to give up my real name based on my Wikipedia account. In short: you have failed to scare me, and in fact, gave me a good chuckle.

Hopefully I am wrong about your intentions and motivations, and you are just unaware that what you're doing is horribly misguided. I am glad you have taken this opportunity to engage in a dialogue here on your talk page, and I hope you continue that. Wes sideman (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you get tracked and found one day don’t blame me. DaddySaurus (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that I was not wrong about your intentions. Have a nice day. Wes sideman (talk) 23:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chad Johnson (television personality), you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 19:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot stop you from exercising any legal rights you have in your country, but you cannot edit if you make legal threats on Wikipedia, nor can you edit if you initiate a legal action. You can pursue any grievances you have using either Wikipedia processes or the courts of your country, but not both. To be unblocked, you will need to clearly withdraw any and all threats of legal action, or indicate that any legal actions you have initiated are resolved. 331dot (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DaddySaurus, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ChrisEvan12 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 20:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you have doubled down, I have removed your ability to edit this page. 331dot (talk) 20:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]