User talk:Dabomb87/Archive 32

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dabomb87. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 30

Speedy deletion

Can you speedy delete these images: File:MikeBibbyMiamiHeat.jpg, File:JuwanHowardMiami.jpg and File:LeBronJamesDunkingHeat.jpg? They are already transferred to the Commons and satisfy CSD F8. Thanks—Chris!_c/t 01:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FAS

Hi Dabomb87, could you please check the latest stats I added at Wikipedia:Featured article statistics? I just very much prefer to have someone double check the figures. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AltText.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:AltText.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:01, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I went ahead and deleted it myself. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Free Hetherington

Thanks for edit protecting. Tadramgo (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Alfa Romeo 33

Thanks for sorting out the Alfa Romeo 33 page naming. Warren (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.

...for the review right. I know we don't really have to say it but I do appreciate it anyways. :) Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 23:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Request

Could you please move protect my user page and protect my user talk page. Thanks. Jessy _(talk) ^(contribs) • 21:54, April 8, 2011 (UTC) 21:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

(edit confilct) Thanks and not to ask too much of you but could you also edit=autoconfirmed my talk page. I will make an alternative page for user who do not have autoconfirmed access. Thanks. Jessy _(talk) ^(contribs) •22:03, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Why? I don't see any evidence that your talk page has ever been the target of vandalism or abuse. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Just in case. I know pages are not protected before the act but an exception is needed. Jessy _(talk) ^(contribs) •22:10, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

I need more than that to make an informed decision. Shoot me an email if it's too sensitive to say on Wiki. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Dabomb87. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Can you explain what's up with the protection? There is literally no evidence that it is necessary - even off-wiki evidence should have to show some reason to believe the talkpage will be a target, of which there is, well. none. I'm happy to have it explained to me in private rather than in public, but some sort of justification is needed. Ironholds (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Check your email. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  - Undone. See WP:PPol. Feel free to reprotect the page, specifying a reason for in line with that. Also keeping in mind talk pages should almost never be protected. Prodego ^talk 23:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
    - I've got no issue with that, but I've sent you an email. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Music of Greece

Hi, thanks for protecting. I posted a message on the Music of Greece talkpage about reverting to the last pre-vandalized version. Its almost 100 edits in the past though. Here is the dif with the current version. What do you think of it?-Yangula (talk) 22:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I know next to nothing about the topic, so I can't tell which edits were bad and which were good. Just be bold and revert, and if another editor complains, you can try another tactic. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

ok, here it comes, one of the vandals is back and tried to revert but did was not very succesfill...Instead he posted the revision on the talkpage.-Yangula (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Protection of K2

Hey, I see you reprotected K2 after the pending changes trial, as the trial appeared to go well for that article are you willing to consider unprotection? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 16:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Great :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 07:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

repeated problem

I noticed you blocked User:Bear620 last month Well, he's now vandalized the Barack Obama article twice. Flatterworld (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

FYI

This discussion relates to an article of which you have been a primary contributor, and may therefore interest you.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

FS for F&A

In regards to the featured sounds milestones:

Featured sounds counts the number of sounds and the number of parts. Some nominations, like this nomination of Vivaldi's The Four Seasons is considered one featured sound in multiple (in this case 12) parts. A non multi-part submission is counted as one featured sound in one part. Therefore:

The 200th Featured Sound was O Canada, performed by the United States Navy Band, and nominated by Ancient Apparition. (nom)

The 300th part was a speech by Franklin Delano Roosevelt on the Banking Crisis that was broadcast on March 12, 1933. The speech was the first of Roosevelt's fireside chats. It was nominated by TonyTheTiger. (nom)

If you have to wait until next week to run this... well let's just say that that may be a good idea. I'll tell you why if you ask, but it might be a good idea to wait on this one. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, I think I will wait on this; I simply don't have time right now. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

No point in keeping it low key now, O Canada is up for delisting. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Rollback right

My rollback component was removed by you for the Violation of the three-revert rule on 30 December 2010 . I think I have learnt lesson of my mistake in last 3 months. I request you to allow me Rollback right again for stooping deliberate vandalism. -- . Shlok _{talk .} 12:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. -- . Shlok _{talk .} 06:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

If you are online

could I get you to take care of this? Thank you. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

When u get online Dabomb87 please I would like your help . I have looked everywhere I know where to look but what can I post on Wikipedia that ok to post and wont be deleted? Can I post a link about my YouTube page ? Bear (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)How do I block a user from messaging me on here?Bear (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Bear (talk) 03:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Bear (talk) 07:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)'Bear620 ^{Talk• Contributions} 03:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Bear (talk) 03:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Bear (talk) 03:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Bear (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

The Daily Caller

First, you and SugarBaby need to agree on a consensus version of the article so that when article is unprotected, the edit warring stops. If you two cannot find a compromise, please pursue the appropriate dispute-resolution steps. Use {{editprotected}} to request an admin to edit the article. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. My first attempt was discussion but he actually kept deleting it just like the content. An admin finally told him to stop. I will follow up in the way you outlined. Thank you. 173.122.85.176 (talk) 02:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

SugarBaby deleted his account. Can we get the page unlocked now?70.90.34.77 (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

FAR: First Deputy Premier of the Soviet Union

I'm finished with you're requests, are there are anymore problems, or are you willing to support the article now? With regards. --TIAYN (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Unprotection

Hi. Could you unprotect The Bad Girls Club (season 7)? It's been confirmed it's going to air this summer and there's some production material that I will be adding to the article (police reports, etc). So I think it's time to be created, for real this time. :) Thanks. —Mike Allen 00:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Please Revert Vandalism

Right after you protected the Ahmad Wali Karzai article, the now banned sock puppet user "She has a bird brain" made three different bad faith POV edits. Could you please revert those changes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.254.144 (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Protection of ED

See WP:ANI#Encyclopedia Dramatica Drama which i think sparked the RFPP. I frankly disagree since there are too many legit edit to warrant full. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 00:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Let be clear the ANI thread is unrelated to you actions The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 00:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Do you think things would be better if I downgraded to semi (genuine question)? There was an awful lot back-and-forth, and I see that the full protection led to good discussion. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

American Academy of Financial Management

I see that you protected the AAFM article. However, can you put back the original article with the 30 plus government and academic citations. There is no reason to let these people or competitors blackwash and smear the article by removing simple government references and citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.102.39 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Multiple editors have expressed an opinion that you are pushing a POV and introducing biased, spam-like material into the article. Please discuss your edits on the talk page first, gain consensus for your preferred version, and then request that it be restored with the {{editsemiprotected}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer userright

I am honored by the confidence in me that you have expressed by giving me this right. Thank you. Cullen328 (talk) 03:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Me, too! I think I'll probably not use it immediately (though I may, I am undecided); in any event, I will get a trusted mentor to talk me through it on a few articles, and watch over me (discuss reasons etc.) for quite a while before I would feel totally happy to fly solo with it. I've read the relevant pages/policies, etc. but will still feel happier being buddied for a while on it. Many thanks. :o) Pesky (talk) 03:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

It's a useless bauble, nothing to get too excited about. Malleus Fatuorum 04:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Well it will be next to useless soon anyway, if this RfC ever finishes. But yes, don't get too excited over it; any competent editor should receive reviewer. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Rollback rights

Hello Dabomb87, I am . Crosstemplejay, I have been on Wikipedia since 2007, though I only recently started doing serious work on WP. I would like to ask you for rollback rights as I hope to help protect Wikipedia better through its use. I am a RCP and have done a lot of work there. Though I mad a mistake over the course of last week for which i was blocked. I have carefully read all the policies about rollback and new pages. I would be grateful if you would grant me. . Crosstemplejay ^{talk .}

Given that you were blocked just a few days ago for careless patrolling, I'd like to see you edit manually for some time before granting you rollback. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Dabomb87, thanks for your reply. If I may know, how long would I be under probation?--CrossTempleJay (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

You're not "under probation"; I just think you need some more time before receiving the tool. A couple of weeks of problem-free editing would be fine with me. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

I hear. Thank you for the reply. I will do my best to implement all I have learnt so far to good effect so I don't fall into any bad edits. God bless.CrossTempleJay (talk) 21:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

A donated Vandalist

Donated wiki user "Yangula" trying to vandalism the article "history of Larissa" watch it by yourself please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.167.242.223 (talk) 11:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

please try to contact with me for further informations about the obvious taktiks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.167.242.223 (talk) 11:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

FLC for Huskies of Honor issue

Hello. I have a currently-open featured list candidacy for the article Huskies of Honor which has received a couple of supports but probably not enough consensus for promotion yet. Unfortunately I am about to leave on vacation as of tomorrow afternoon; I will most likely be completely away from Wikipedia until May 2 or 3. I wanted to give you a heads-up because I will not be able to respond to any further comments while I'm away. I would have suggested archiving the FLC except for the two supports. If you have any thoughts or suggestions I'd appreciate them. –Grondemar 00:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't mind keeping it open. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Threatening me with a lawsuit

Dear Dabomb87,

I have been maintaining the Value Line page as events surrounding the company and its owner have unfolded. I have tried to present the facts accurately by providing 3rd party citations wherever possible and be cooperative with other posters. I am now being threatened with a lawsuit for defamation by Stpatrick's11 who I presume is somehow affiliated with the company or its owner. As indicated in the section under lawsuits, this seems to be a tactic the company and its owner have used in the past to squelch criticism.

I ask that you review the posts so that the events surrounding Value Line be told without the threats or intimidation.

Thank you,

Vlanalyst (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I will follow your advice and disengage. I assume the other person will do the same, otherwise their tactic of threatening lawsuits has prevailed. Vlanalyst (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I will keep tabs on the article. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

vandal HiddenMetropol.population by yangula on"larisa" again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.152.85.32 (talk) 00:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

For GOD sh

I cannot understand me and other(Larisians) whats wrong with Yangula and vandalise all time Larisa article Watch the follow contricts: elevation_max = talk:212.152.85.32|talk]]) 00:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

population_metro = ????? (erased by user yangula) and the text goes: is a principal agricultural centre and a national transportation hub, linked by road and rail with the port of Volos and with Thessaloniki and Athens. The population of the urban area is around 150,000 Strong vandalism all time. Then blame the others for vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.129.15.249 (talk) 01:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Mauricio Macri

A pair of hours ago you semiprotected the article Mauricio Macri, as a user with many IPs was adding a tale about his shop being closed. Now he uses the account User:Davidglen77 to evade the semiprotection and restore the tale once more. Cambalachero (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Projection of Template:WWE

Thank you for forcing discussion. Unfortunately, more full protection is probably needed (check list of templates in here, for examples of more edit warring. I would do it, but I have already voiced an opinion. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. Just to let you know that User:Porchcrop/Wikipedia talk:Antiquette/Archive was a userfied copy of Wikipedia talk:Antiquette. So would you mind undeleting it? Thanks. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 07:24, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

OK, done. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Dabomb87. You have new messages at Slon02's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Protection of Tibet article

Did you really intend to abort pending changes indefinitely? Thanks --–HXL's Roundtable and Record 02:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

I've restored it, but keep in mind that articles may not have PC much longer. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

The discussions were still on why did you remove the protection?? Please revert to version before you unprotected the article and protect it once again. There is no rush to unprotect it and each person was only able to make 3-4 statements to each point of discussion as only four days had passed. Don't get fooled by HXL49's POV pushing.--UplinkAnsh (talk) 13:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

UplinkAsh can continue to use a common, whining tactic (notice I did not say he is a whiner) and dispel his lies and propaganda. The recent ANI section on me is evidence enough of the latter.

The protection was set to automatically expire after 72 hours. See protection policy for more. And full lockdowns of pages are often done without regard to what version was being protected. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 14:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)