User talk:Dabangg Returns

@TomStar81:, If you are a check User, then know that I am using Vodafone connection. Who is this padmalakshim'sx. I can guarantee that you will find at least some difference. My operating system is Windows 8, Padmalakshim whatever, her operating system must be something else. Don't block innocent users using the same IP range.--Dabangg Returns (talk) 06:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Padmalakshmisx: You useless worthless idiot, because of you these dumbest check users blocked me. You must quit Wikipedia permanently.

@TomStar81:

Dabangg is a popular Bollywood action movie.--Dabangg Returns (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A claim for checkuser has been filed for here; based on the results your account may or may not be unblocked. Its out of my hands now. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dabangg Returns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Padmakakshmix. Today i wanted to edit as IP, but i was shocked to find that even my Ip range is blocked by Jamesb watson. This padmalakshi is real headcahe. @Bb23:, you are not able to find any proper evidence, you accepted that. This is my IP range, which is blocked for unknown reasons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/1.39.36.246 Only James watson can tell why that range was blocked. What should i do? change my ISP provider? Otherwise my every account will be blocked as padmalakshmiszx. Dabangg Returns (talk) 01:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, based on your comments towards your apparent sock, I'd be unwilling to unblock you even if you were proved to be totally separate. — foxj 01:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Foxj: I disagree with your comment "apparaent sock". I am not his/her's socks or they are not my sock. Let me ask you. If i am wrongly tagged as someone's sock, what methods should i use to prove i am not him. The CU results were inconclusive. I know i am not padmalakshimx. But i was sure there will be 100% unrelated, unfortunately there were slight similarities between IP's. @Bbb23: should make another strcit CU check and confirm I am not padmamklkah. If unblocked, i will not make such comments. @Foxj: i made such comments to prove that i am completely unrelated. I have read guide to unblock request. But that guide is for users who are blocked for their behaviour. I am blocked as collateral damage. Guide to unblock requests has no suggestions for users like me. Can you explain how innocent users blocked for wrong reasons will make unblock request. I searched Wikipedia and couldn't find pages about innocent users blocked. Dabangg Returns (talk) 04:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So many things wrong with your statements. First, the rangeblock does not prevent a user from editing using that IP address. It just prevents the IP address from editing. Second, the CU results were not "inconclusive". Third, regardless of your perception of why you were blocked, you were blocked for behavior. If you want to appeal through another mechanism than an unblock request, you may use WP:UTRS.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:42, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 For my own safety i decided not to look at padma's contributions or their SPI page. You serously believe that I am Padmalaksmix? I never did this UTRS. And my first block was not for behaviour, but my username was similar to a sockpuppet Dabannggg3. Dabangg is a popular Bollywood action movie which means "daring". You must run another CU and check every detail. I don't believe everything related to my account matches with Padma.I am not that user, there must be some technical difference that you are ignoring. You can say my unblock request was rejected due to behaviour, but that was the only way at that time. Did i abuse my blocking administrator?. Did I abuse you?. Padmalshj if they were socking, they must have some other agenda, They had no aim for blocking me by using the same IP range. Still i abused them instead of you people. Everybody can clearly understand that i won't use such language if unblocked. Dabangg Returns (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dabangg Returns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can guarantee, that i am a victim of sharing same ISP provider and I will not break any rules if unblocked.Dabangg Returns (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The strategy of plausible deniability may work in some venues, but not here in a WP:DUCK case. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not remove declined unblock requests while this account is blocked. Doing so again, or attempting to use Wikipedia as a WP:SOAPBOX, will result in your access to this page being revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional CU findings

I was pinged to the Talk page of The Amazing Spiderman (talk · contribs · count), a user I'm not familiar with, but who was recently CU-blocked by Elockid. According to Spiderman, this account, Dabangg Returns, belongs to him, and he implies that his account is a sock of older accounts. His apparent motive in posting this information is because he mistakenly believes that all the IPs in his "new" range are blocked and he believes that's unfair. I'll say two things. First, Dabangg Returns is Confirmed to The Amazing Spiderman. Second, the probable master of all these accounts is Undertrialryryr (talk · contribs · count). Many accounts that match each other have been blocked in the past by CheckUsers but without tags. The history of Undertrialryryr is somewhat complex and confusing, which may account for the CheckUser actions (some CheckUsers intentionally don't tag accounts) and is also the reason I say "probable". I do not intend to tag Dabangg Returns, but this block should now be treated as a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]