User talk:Daask/Archive 3
Your statement on my page.
[edit]Disruptive editing is EXACTLY what I think Binksternet is doing. He is driving me away, and I think many others capable responsible adult people with his, for lack of a better term, temper tantrums
Why should I care what “Meters” says if at this point I am disgusted with the mob controling Wikipedia editors now? That he can kick me out? Not much of a threat at this point, truth be told.
FYI, I hold four US Patents, have authored or co-authored in excess of 20 peer reviewed scientific acadeic journal articles, have written numerous other papers that are not in academic journals. I am on a commitee that writes & reviews US National engineering standards for gear design. I am the chief engineer of an international corporation.
I choose to donate my time to try to help what I thought was a worthwhile endevor, to find it dominated by — for want of a better term, a political clique of jerks.
Binksternet, Meters, and others are the problem. Me reporting the problem is not the problem.
Montestruc (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
TonyBallioni (talk) 12:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
[edit]
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Acts of Shmona and of Gurya. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.
For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.
If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Please read MOS:ERA. JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Short description. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RexxS (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- @RexxS: I apologize. I made several edits in a row and was unaware of your revert. Daask (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Luis de la Paz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Request for mercy and closure
[edit]Thank you for the cookies...
I'm not qualified to contribute my wisdom here.. ..
The subjects of cited knowledge based research that is published here about real issues about real people who have had foundations built atop their graves by their own personal actions and first hand knowledge . Knowledge only known to those who were suffering from lack of understanding and knowledge of abuse by arbitrary powers upon the common people..
New emerging technology has empowered the have nots to develop equity in their basic human liberties under the constitution...
This is not my opinion it is historical facts that have shaped the ever CHANGING American politics and laws..
Without any documentation of Mary Ellen WILSON MCCORMICK there would be a gap in the history of the humane society and child protection bibliography..
Her LEGACY is absent of her unknown knowledge and insight into the drastic divisions that have become the child protection services..
Thrown away children in ongoing research dating back to the late 1970s through the 1980s were a major factor for the 1983 act. .1984? ..
I ask you as an editor for your opinion and I ask you for human compassion to remember Mary Ellen Wilson (McCormick) And her place in the encyclopedia...
Without the source of information there is no truth or trust in the words of the people Connie Ford Johnson (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Connie Ford Johnson: I do not understand your request. Perhaps you are looking for the article on Mary Ellen Wilson. Daask (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
On the Tobacco monopoly
[edit]Hi there Daask! Thanks for the cleanup of my work at Ilocos Norte Tobacco Excise Tax funds controversy. I hope you don't mind that I brought back the 1800s history in a much-truncated form - I just felt it was important to demonstrate Ilocos Norte's dependence on Tobacco production. What's still missing from that section is how Tobacco policy has created misery for farmers in the region since the 1700s, which provides a historical/socio-cultural context for the controversy. But I haven't really studied the Tobacco monopoly in enough depth yet to know how to use scholarly sources to draw out the linkages between historical policy and contemporary scandals. :S Anyway. That's just me explaining my return of the section. - Alternativity (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
fake civility
[edit]shows your true civility to remove my last messageVrishaek —Preceding undated comment added 12:57, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Sirico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Imperial Ministry of Food and Agriculture
[edit]
Hello, Daask. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Imperial Ministry of Food and Agriculture".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 11:43, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Daask. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Daask. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've nominated this category to be renamed to Category:Articles with short descriptions (plural). Since you've edited the category, would you please offer input at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 December 31? Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 02:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)