User talk:Da Boz152

Welcome!

Hello, Da Boz152, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 22:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pukerua Bay has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pukerua Bay was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://pukeruabayschoolmuseum.weebly.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Thanks for your contributions. Please have a read of Help:Minor edit. In a nutshell, when you add content (and that includes photos), it's never a minor edit. Schwede 66 07:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Noah Edward Book Series

Hello, Da Boz152,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Noah Edward Book Series should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Edward Book Series .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure

Hello, Da Boz152. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure

Hello, Da Boz152,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Edward and the Time Traveling Adventure .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that in this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Edward Book Series, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Edward Book Series. Toddst1 (talk) 01:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While well-sourced, objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 18th century hairstyles

The article 18th century hairstyles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced original research. No encyclopedic value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]