User talk:DYPN-AM

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Bertrand101 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Progressive Broadcasting Corporation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Progressive Broadcasting Corporation was changed by DYPN-AM (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899386 on 2017-05-10T00:08:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DYPN-AM

The article DYPN-AM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be yet another hoax Philippine radio station article by LTA Bertrand101. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101 and Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Bertrand101. The supposed website for this station does not mention it, and I can find no evidence that this station exists. The "test broadcast" or "future station" bit is characteristic of these hoaxes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meters (talk) 04:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]