User talk:DVD Vision

Talkpage Blanking

Hi, DVD Vision. Just a note that blanking your talk page after you receive messages is not a good practice. See our help page on archiving talk pages to get started. It keeps your talk page clean while also allowing people to read past messages without having to dig through this page's edit history. Thanks, Upsidedown Keyboard (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DVD Vision (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do someone can explain me what's the joke of my blocking, I just removed a link related to Service Merchandise because I searched and found the investigation in question, I cannot at the same time be accused of this investigation. Adding reliable sources like I did has no connection with previous investigations. Is this a ridiculous trap where anyone who edit on this will be accused? I'm waiting an unblock because there is no justification in connection with this blocking. Also, I revised history of Consumers Distributing and added just reliable sources from Wikieditor600 plus my personal touch of reliable sources, it was from him and why he's not blocked when he had added a source similar to the investigation when I didn’t added this information that I found doubtful... Really incomprehensible! When there’s a template to invite us to add sources, it's logical that we can add reliable sources like I did, my history of editing proves it!

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry and/or checkuser block. Check users have access to technical and personally identifying information they may not disclose openly on Wikipedia. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB. If this is not your original account, you will need to appeal at your original account. -- Deep fried okra 11:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DVD Vision (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Deep fried okra, I make another request because you should look what I made in the history of Service Merchandise, it's totally the opposite of what makes the sockppupet, it’s really a mistake to block me. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Your violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE was established via technical evidence and is not in doubt. Yamla (talk) 13:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.