User talk:DMWN

MCA Music Entertainment Group

You should know that MCA Records is the proper redirect as MCA (founded in the 1920s as a talent agency) did not enter the recorded music business until it bought the American branch of Decca Records in 1962. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rahsaan Patterson

Hi, DMWN! I was wondering if you had any better references for Patterson's being gay? He doesn't actually say he's gay in the ref you provided, though he does imply it in everything he says. The difference, though, is striking, especially when it comes to biographies of living people. For instance, Jodie Foster has *all but* come out, and until she does, we can't really label her. Thoughts? Reply on Talk:Rahsaan Patterson? Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the unnecessary tables in Madonna album pages containing esoteric information

Hi,

Please read the following WIKI Album guidelines : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Track_listing

I believe that you have interpreted the following paragraph of the WIKI ALBUM guidelines:

Particularly for hip hop albums, it is helpful to list which members of a group (or guests) rap on which verses as well as mentioning sampling sources. This can be done in a nested list, as in the example above. Using a table is recommended in more complicated situations (see Before These Crowded Streets for example). If a table is used, it should be formatted using class="wikitable", using column headings "#", "Title" and "Length" for the track number, the track title and the track length, respectively.

But please not the words in bold. At no point in the whole of the WIKI ALBUM guidelines does it suggest to include esoteric, unnecessary information such as 'producers', so PLEASE stop reverting to an elaborate but unnecessary table. The format of Madonna's albums is currently under discussion in the Talk page of 'Hard Candy', if you feel strongly about the use of tables, please make your opinion known there and we can all try to reach a consensus.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reqluce (talk • contribs) 07:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE READ THE WIKI GUIDELINES AND DISCUSS THE FORMAT OF THE TRACKLISTING IN THE 'HARD CANDY' TALK PAGE BEFORE STARTING A REVISION WAR THANK YOU. Reqluce (talk) 08:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on March 27 2008 to American Life

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 17:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not love)} 17:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles with no reliable source

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Give It 2 Me (Madonna song), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - eo (talk) 11:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jermaine Jackson. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 00:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Common name policy

Hello, DMWN. I moved Jessica Brennan back to Jessica Buchanan due to the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) policy. It is the reason that the Carly Corinthos article is still titled by Carly Corinthos, instead of by whatever current last name she is sporting at the moment due to marriage, for example.

Anyway, I'll see you around. Flyer22 (talk) 18:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ElektraLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ElektraLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WBR logo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:WBR logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of One Life to Live cast members

Hello. Red link are perfectly acceptable, and really should be left alone. Just because, say for example, John Rue does not have an article, that doesn't mean that one won't be created within the next few days. If the article would to be created, then every other article that doesn't have John Rue linked would have to be edited and re-linked. This saves time, and it is a lot easier to handle. So please leave these alone.

As for the other changes, there are no sources provided at the same article which can prove that Scott Evans and Jack Rovello are contract. So until a reliable source can be posted, this should stay the same. Thank you! --OLTL2002 (talk) 02:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniellerayburn.jpg

By blanking its page, is your intention to remove File:Daniellerayburn.jpg from Wikipedia? Anna Lincoln 09:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please. - DMWN (talk) 09:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FNV logo 2.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:FNV logo 2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Myfavoritegirl.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Myfavoritegirl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FNV logo 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FNV logo 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]