User talk:DL6443/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:DL6443. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Banned
As a result of this discussion, you are hereby forbidden from making any edit, anywhere on Wikipedia, via any account or as an unregistered user, under any and all circumstances, indefinitely. This ban is subject to the standard offer, and may only be appealed to the Arbitration Committee prior to the offer's effective date (6 months after your last known attempt to evade your block/this ban). — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
DL6443 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18079 was submitted on Apr 20, 2017 06:11:52. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 06:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
DL6443 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #25506 was submitted on Jun 07, 2019 04:33:50. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
DL6443 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I, SlitherioFan2016, would like to review my site ban.
- I have reviewed every single policy on Wikipedia thoroughly.
- I now completely understand what edit warring is.
- I now completely understand why I got so many blocks.
- I was told to leave Wikipedia and never to create any new accounts and not to edit as an IP for at least 6 to 12 months. I have stayed away from the project for 24 months, and am older and have a better understanding of the project works. I was in 6th grade at the time of my first block, and now I am in 9th grade.
- Please unblock my original account so that I can have another chance to be useful on the English Wikipedia.
- If unblocked, I would stay away from content ratings articles and start off by fixing off JR East fleet totals, such as the removal of 209 series trains on the Chūō-Sōbu Line.
- I really do promise not to edit war ever again. If there are disagreements over editing I would seek dispute resolution instead.
- I have made some useful edits on FANDOM. The FANDOM account I used is called SlitherioFan2016
- I did edit as User:Mali1702 as well as all the other accounts in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlitherioFan2016 and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlitherioFan2016.
- I understand that seeking forgiveness is especially difficult for sockpuppeteers because the act of sockpuppetry is perceived as dishonest, even if the sockpuppeteer in question is not inherently malevolent. However, I also understand that sockpuppeteers aren’t necessarily “never” unblocked. Rather, sockpuppeteers are rarely unblocked.
- As I am currently sitebanned I would request that this review be posted to the relevant notice board where possible. --SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Accept reason:
By community consensus, your site ban is lifted. Sandstein 21:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- For reference, the ban discussion is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive949#User:SummerPhDv2.0/Wikipediholism trolling. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have posted this to WP:AN#SlitherioFan2016 ban review request
- @MJL: I do enjoy making constructive edits. Two years have passed and I now feel super-ashamed and sorry for what I did wrong. And I have found errors that need to be corrected, so I would like to correct them. --SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
By community consensus, your site ban is lifted. Welcome back. Sandstein 21:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Table syntax
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Is it possible to remove white spaces between borders in wikitables? I currently have:
{| class="wikitable"
|-style="border-bottom:solid 3px #f15a22;"
|style="background-color:#ccc;"|
|colspan="10"|<div style="float:left;">← Atami</div><div style="float:right;">Kuroiso, Maebashi →</div>
|-style="line-height: 0px; border-bottom:solid 5px #9acd32;"
|colspan="11" style="padding:0"|
|-
! Car No. !! 1 !! 2 !! 3 !! style="background: #E6FFE6"| 4 !! style="background: #E6FFE6"| 5 !! 6 !! 7 !! 8 !! 9 !! 10
|-
! Designation
| Tc' || M' || M || style="background: #F5FFF5"| Tsd' || style="background: #F5FFF5"| Tsd || T || T || M' || M || Tc
|-
! Numbering
| KuHa E230-8000 || MoHa E230-3500 || MoHa E231-1500 || style="background: #F5FFF5"| SaRo E230-1000 || style="background: #F5FFF5"| SaRo E231-1000 || SaHa E231-1000 || SaHa E231-1000 || MoHa E230-1500 || MoHa E231-3500 || KuHa E231-8500
|}
which produces this table:
← Atami Kuroiso, Maebashi →
| ||||||||||
Car No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Designation | Tc' | M' | M | Tsd' | Tsd | T | T | M' | M | Tc |
Numbering | KuHa E230-8000 | MoHa E230-3500 | MoHa E231-1500 | SaRo E230-1000 | SaRo E231-1000 | SaHa E231-1000 | SaHa E231-1000 | MoHa E230-1500 | MoHa E231-3500 | KuHa E231-8500 |
I am trying to remove the bit of white space between the orange and light green borders. Thanks. – SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 04:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed by adding style="padding:0" to the table cell between the two lines. (diff here) stwalkerster (sock | talk) 11:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Forgot to log in
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I very recently made this edit to Sōtetsu Shin-Yokohama Line, and then realising I forgot to log in. This may seem like a silly question, but what do I do to avoid getting re-blocked for sockpuppetry because of my long history of it two years ago? Thanks --SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 07:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Accidentally not logging in to edit should not be considered sockpuppetry, especially if you admit to it. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Reference syntax
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
What is the correct syntax for url references? I want to add a reference of the following link: [1] (sorry that it's in Japanese but the best one I could find) --SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 00:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- The syntax is
<ref>www.example.com</ref>
inserted right after the text you intend to support with your reference. Alternatively, if you want to go the extra mile, you can use Template:Cite web which is our gold standard for referencing websites. For more information, see Help:Referencing for beginners. 78.28.44.223 (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
apology
haha yeah man ok ill stop messin around now, the edits were based off this video --> the video its a good laugh haha yea thanks 2600:1009:B155:A73A:C491:F974:3C3B:E806 (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Will & Grace (season 11)
I don't need to reference once it's aired as it's taken from the credits. 2001:470:1F2D:C:0:0:0:6 (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Noted. --SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 02:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Kiss Him GoodBye
I'm not sure why you changed that information back that I edited, but the section I removed was factually incorrect.
Hey Hey Hey Goodbye has been a staple of Montreal Canadiens games for decades and is very much part of the tradition of the team and a huge part of attending live games in Montreal.
Saying it was part of the Quebec Nordiques heritage is quite simply wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.132.83 (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for that information. However, in the future, please remember to sign your talk page comments with four tildes
~~~~
. Thanks. --SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 18:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Change of username
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
How does one change his username on Wikipedia? There doesn't appear to be a setting for it under Preferences. Thanks --SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 22:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- WP:RENAME has the details! --Yamla (talk) 22:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Trouted
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
Just so you know, by transcluding the AN3 noticeboard into that talk page, you've now pinged me and probably every other user on it. RedPanda25 01:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @RedPanda25: Yes, I realised that. It was a syntax error and I just fixed it. --DL6443 01:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Quick Clarification
Yamla and Sandstein, after I was un-banned from Wikipedia in 2019 (as SlitherioFan2016) do any page bans still apply, such as Motion picture content rating system? This was not clarified at the time of my unbanning so I just want to confirm this. --DL6443 01:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- DL6443, that depends on the provisions of your bans and unban, neither of which are linked to here. Sandstein 06:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Sandstein: I am not sure I understand what you mean by "provision". Somewhere in the discussion about lifting my site ban there was talk about a topic ban on content ratings articles (such as Motion picture content rating system), to avoid the previous problems we faced back in 2016-17. When I was un-site banned I was only told that I had my ban lifted, without mention of a topic ban on those articles. So my question is simply whether I have an active topic ban in those areas (in other words, if I edit contructively e.g. fix a typo on one of those articles, will I be sanctioned for it) --DL6443 07:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- DL6443, because you do not link to the decisions to ban or unban you, I cannot offer my view about this. Sandstein 07:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Sandstein: My apologies for misunderstanding. Ban discussion: [2] Unban discussion: [3] --DL6443 07:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- DL6443, because the site ban and unban decision did not address any existing other bans, they remain in force. Sandstein 08:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Sandstein. --Yamla (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- DL6443, because the site ban and unban decision did not address any existing other bans, they remain in force. Sandstein 08:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Sandstein: My apologies for misunderstanding. Ban discussion: [2] Unban discussion: [3] --DL6443 07:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- DL6443, because you do not link to the decisions to ban or unban you, I cannot offer my view about this. Sandstein 07:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Sandstein: I am not sure I understand what you mean by "provision". Somewhere in the discussion about lifting my site ban there was talk about a topic ban on content ratings articles (such as Motion picture content rating system), to avoid the previous problems we faced back in 2016-17. When I was un-site banned I was only told that I had my ban lifted, without mention of a topic ban on those articles. So my question is simply whether I have an active topic ban in those areas (in other words, if I edit contructively e.g. fix a typo on one of those articles, will I be sanctioned for it) --DL6443 07:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Well, regardless of the prior existence of these bans, I just closed the AN discussion and you are free to edit those four pages again. Primefac (talk) 20:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Noted. DL6443 20:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Amulets
You reverted a set of useful edits without giving any explanation. This is poor treatment of a new editor doing constructive work, especially from someone with a history of irresponsible behavior. If you have specific reasons for your edits, explain them one by one. Will Hanley (talk) 02:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Will Hanley: I was not aware, sorry. I am relatively inexperienced in RCP at this stage. My full apologies to the editor involved. --DL6443 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thanks!
Cookies! | ||
MelecieDiancie has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. thanks for being part of the counter-vandalism people! here's a cookie as to not flood you with more thanks notifications. • | melecie | t 01:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC) To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! |