User talk:DJames5/Job Satisfaction Equity Theory
Peer Review
[edit]Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Date of review 05/06/2013
Name of editor: DJames5 URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013 Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit
Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided
Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting
Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free
Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Name of student reviewer ** | Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/5/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: DJames5 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/5/2013 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 5/5/2013 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | Image not needed |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The information provided was matching to a topic from textbook. |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Information accurate |
Wikiformatting | Nice formatting |
Grammar & composition | Well done |
Other comments | Might want to add some more info for more credit. |
Peer Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo
Date of review: 5/3/13
Name of editor: Dexter James DJames5
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory#Equity_Theory
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/2/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 5/1/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): 3 sentences
Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes
Wikiformatting: bullets, list form
Grammar & composition: Perfect grammar and composition
Other comments: very short
--Christina geo (talk) 20:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Name of student reviewer ** | Wikipedia User: M.Caban |
---|---|
Date of review | 5/3/2013 |
Name of editor | Wikipedia User: DJames5 |
URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Job_Satisfaction_Equity_Theory#Equity_Theory |
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/3/2013 |
Date review submitted to instructor | 5/3/2013 |
Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
Image (needed/appropriate) | Image not needed |
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The information provided was accurate from textbook |
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The information was accurate |
Wikiformatting | Good on number list |
Grammar & composition | No spelling errors or grammar found |
Other comments | Excellent edit.
On the second sentence "these" the "t" needs to be capital, "These". Pointer, you stated "Other psychologist". If you can state which types it would help or leave it as psychologist in general and maybe take "Other" out. |