User talk:DJMD01

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Joeyv1000 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to KOOP (FM) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to KOOP (FM), you will be blocked from editing. Sockpuppetry will also get you blocked. NeutralHomer • Talk 01:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making personal attacks. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJMD01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User C.Fred has been hostile and has reverted page content that violates wikipedia regulations. Recommend that his account and IP address be sanctioned immediately.

Decline reason:

Request does not address reasons for your block - and edits such as this gem do not indicate your intent to edit constructively. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 02:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.