User talk:DJBrimstorm

April 2022

Hello, I'm Volten001. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Drmargi that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Volten001 ^☎ 19:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was a joke, I only made that comment so he and other editors would stop antagonizing my edits. DJBrimstorm (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use language like that or use such jokes. Additionally, Drmargi reverted your edit on The Masked Singer (American season 7) and you engaged in an edit-war using offensive words (evidently directed to them) in the edit summary. How do you explain that?Volten001 ^☎ 21:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She didn't find any humor in your "joke" and your tacky language. You're becoming disruptive, not making your case for the edits you want. That will get you nowhere. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 20:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're a women? I thought you were a man? DJBrimstorm (talk) 21:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Your editing on The Masked Singer (American season 7) is becoming increasingly disruptive. You know by now that the route to settling this dispute is the talk page. Failure to abide by policy will) result in a block. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 16:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But why did you kept my edits? I thought you hated them? DJBrimstorm (talk) 16:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of DarkWariior (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJBrimstorm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There’s no why this account is sock puppetry. If it was it would have multiple edits of the Hell’s Kitchen articles but there’s only a few. Please I know this account isn’t sock puppetry DJBrimstorm (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Funny- every sock puppet denies being one, since that is the whole point. Saying it's not you because you didn't edit the article as much is like saying you weren't speeding because you were only 10 over the limit instead of 15. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

All I’m asking for is another chance please, I really like editing on Wikipedia please. DJBrimstorm (talk) 01:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJBrimstorm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I’m asking for is another chance please, I really like editing on Wikipedia please. DJBrimstorm (talk) 01:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No chance, not while you continue violating Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.