User talk:DF27

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is DF27's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Final warning, repeated blankings on many pages

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Spanish language, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jeppiz (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post such an aggressive warning without properly diagnosing the problem. DF27 (talk) 18:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is obvious. Your frequent blankings, your nationalist POV, your disruptive behavior and your constant edit warring at several articles against the obvious consensus.Jeppiz (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing I have done violates Wikipedia policy. I see you are the one here with an agenda, which is sad, as I came to Wikipedia with the intention of improving the quality of its articles. Consensus is not formed by 1 editor having a POV. DF27 (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But, perhaps, we can discuss the issues. What precisely is wrong with my edits and which codes do they violate? DF27 (talk) 18:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a lot of things you have done violates Wikipedia policies. You are not allowed to edit war, which you have done on multiple pages. As for consensus, if you're the only one deleting content and there are several others reverting you, then it's obvious the consensus is against your edit. The fact that you blanket revert over and over again is in clear disregard of Wikipedia's policies.Jeppiz (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have not specified which policies I have violated; stating "a lot of things" is not sufficient. I did not initiate edit war, you did. English is not my native language, but I am positive that what I am doing is well within policy. DF27 (talk) 22:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've provided reliable sources for the names Lőrinc, Lorens and Lorents in the articles Laurentius ([1]), Lorents ([2]), and Lőrinc ([3]). Please do not revert.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources do not matter in this situation; the point is that there are enough name variants in the articles. I will revert, and you need to stop pushing an agenda. DF27 (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name variants include: Llorenç (Catalan), Lovre, Lovrenco, Lovro (Croatian), Vavřinec (Czech), Lars, Lorens, Lasse, Laurits, Lauritz (Danish), Lars, Laurens, Lourens, Lau, Rens (Dutch), Laurence, Lawrence, Larrie, Larry, Lauren, Laurie, Lawrie, Laz, Loren, Lorin, Lorrin (English), Lars, Lari, Lasse, Lassi, Lauri (Finnish), Laurent, Enzo (French), Lourens (Frisian), Lars, Laurenz, Lorenz, Lenz (German), Lavrentios (Greek), Lőrinc (Hungarian), Lárus (Icelandic), Labhrás (Irish), Lau, Lor (Limburgish), Laurynas (Lithuanian), Larkin, Law (Medieval English), Lars (Medieval Scandinavian), Lorencio (Medieval Spanish), Lars, Lorens, Lasse, Laurits, Lauritz (Norwegian), Wawrzyniec (Polish), Lourenço (Portuguese), Laurențiu (Romanian), Lavrenti, Lavrentiy, Lavrenty (Russian), Labhrainn (Scottish), Vavrinec (Slovak), Lovrenc, Lovro (Slovene), Lars, Lorens, Lasse (Swedish)

April 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ^{we ♥ our hive} 04:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]