User talk:DEEPAKKRISHNANPR

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Cryptic 16:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DEEPAKKRISHNANPR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

actually i dont know the reason why am blocked,as a new user i dont know where i added span link if i done like that can you please guide me how i can avoid that links

Decline reason:

Apparently the admin who blocked you picked the wrong notification template: You didn't add any external links, but from both your username and your edits it's clear you're here to use Wikipedia as a PR tool, making this an "advertising-only account"; that's what the block log entry says. There were also copyright issues because you copy-pasted non-free content onto Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 02:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DEEPAKKRISHNANPR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

am not created account for advertising purpose ,guide me how i can avoid the span link DEEPAKKRISHNANPR (talk) 02:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Following Origamite's comment below, could you clarify whether you are editing on behalf of a public relations company? PhilKnight (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't spam links, but you added copyrighted text to Wikipedia. That will also earn you an indefinite block. It's hard to assume good faith when both your username and user page say that you're a PR. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]