User talk:DCKH
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DCKH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Exemplo347 (talk) 19:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Wrong zero line?
[edit]I note that you deleted a graph in United States energy independence for having a "wrong zero line." Could you explain what was wrong with it? Thanks. Plazak (talk) 21:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Plazak: Yes: The vertical (y) axis of the chart should start at "0" and not below, like it is currently at File:US Net Gas Imports.svg.--DCKH (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- The below zero part of the graph shows the current situation of net exports. It is neither inaccurate nor illogical. Again, in what sense is it "wrong"? And how would you construct the graph? Regards. Plazak (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Plazak: Ok, I've just noticed that the "Total Net Imports" can be both negative and positive so my complaint is pointless. Would you allow me to rename "Total Net Imports" into a more accurate "Trade balance"? If exports > imports the calculation "imports - exports" no longer yields net imports. Regards, --DCKH (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Renaming the graph "Trade Balance" is an excellent suggestion to avoid confusion. Thanks. Plazak (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- The below zero part of the graph shows the current situation of net exports. It is neither inaccurate nor illogical. Again, in what sense is it "wrong"? And how would you construct the graph? Regards. Plazak (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Soviet integrated circuit designation
[edit]The designation uses the Cyrillic alphabet which sometimes leads to confusion where a Cyrillic letter has the same appearance as a Latin letter but is romanized as a different letter. Furthermore, for some Cyrillic letters the Romanization is ambiguous. - Why would you consider this statement unencyclopaedic? The designation certainly does use the cyrillic alphabet. There are numerous examples on the web and even here in the English Wikipedia where people mistake a cyrillic glyph for the identical-looking latin glyph (KP580BM80A instead of KR580VM80A). In my mind this justifies a clarification. Cheers, Drahtlos (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)